Control Logic Analyzer for Vehicle Device Conflict Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicles lack automated control of devices based on environmental conditions, leading to driver distraction, user discomfort, and complexity in operating multiple devices simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

A control logic analyzer that decomposes control logics into executable instructions, searches for potential conflicts with stored logics, and merges compatible commands, ensuring safe and efficient operation of devices like air conditioners and power windows based on sensor data and user inputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a driver manually operates devices in the vehicle, then the devices can be controlled, but the driver's attention is distracted and safety is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDevice control convenienceVSAvoidDriving safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables devices to operate automatically based on environmental sensor data and pre-configured control logics. The vehicle environment self-regulates through automated control of air conditioners, power windows, and other devices without requiring driver intervention, thus maintaining safety while ensuring device functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Control logics are pre-configured and stored in the system before driving situations arise. When environmental conditions are detected, the corresponding pre-prepared control instructions are automatically executed, eliminating the need for real-time driver decision-making and manual operation during critical driving moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system automatically controls devices based on environment, then driving safety is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDriving safetyVSAvoidControl system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into independent control logics, each handling specific device control scenarios. The control logic decomposer breaks down complex control requirements into discrete, manageable instruction sets for individual devices or device groups, making the overall system complexity manageable through modular organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control logic analyzer serves multiple functions: it receives control logics from various sources, analyzes and decomposes them into executable instructions, checks device readiness, searches for conflicts in the database, and manages control instruction execution. This multi-functional design reduces the need for separate specialized components, thereby managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple control logics are stored for different devices, then device control versatility is improved, but conflicts between control logics may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDevice control versatilityVSAvoidControl logic consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback through the conflict detection mechanism. Before executing new control logics, the system searches the database for existing logics and identifies potential conflicts. This feedback loop ensures that only consistent control logics are executed, maintaining reliability while preserving versatility through comprehensive conflict checking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary conflict detection and resolution before control logic execution. By searching the database for existing control logics and identifying potential conflicts in advance, the system prevents contradictory actions from occurring, ensuring consistent and reliable device operation across multiple control scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Manufacturing precision

If control logics are decomposed into detailed instructions, then execution precision is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveControl instruction precisionVSAvoidLogic processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Control logics are decomposed into executable instructions in advance and stored in the system. When environmental conditions trigger a control logic, the pre-decomposed instructions are ready for immediate execution, minimizing processing time while maintaining the precision of detailed control instructions through prior preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10318519B2Control logic analyzer and method thereof
Publication Date: 2019.06.11 HARMAN INT IND INC
  • US10318519B2 patent drawing
  • US10318519B2 patent drawing
  • US10318519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control logic analyzer for controlling a plurality of devices is provided. The control logic analyzer comprises: a control logic decomposer configured to analyze control logics from different sources to identify devices involved in the control logics from the plurality of devices, and decompose the control logics into control instructions to be executed by the identified devices; and a potential conflict searcher configured to search a database for storing decomposed control logics and determine whether there is any potential conflict between the current control logic and the control logics previously stored in the database.