Control Module Timing Guarantees for Faster Automated Responses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing secure control devices face challenges in reducing response time without relying on safe communication facilities or synchronized clocks, which are costly and effort-intensive to implement.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves configuring control modules to ensure minimum time intervals between selected events during communication, allowing for guaranteed temporal properties without the need for synchronized clocks or additional hardware, and can be implemented in software.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If redundant transmission is used to improve immunity to electromagnetic interference, then reliability is improved, but response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmunity to electromagnetic interferenceVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by transmitting a first data set before the second data set, and preliminarily evaluates the first data set. This staged approach allows the system to have the second data set ready in advance, reducing the overall response time while maintaining redundant transmission for reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts its evaluation process by conditionally evaluating the first data set only if the second data set is not received within the expected time window. This dynamic behavior optimizes response time by avoiding unnecessary waiting while maintaining reliability through fallback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If safe communication facilities and synchronized clocks are used to reduce response time, then response time is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidhardware requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses software-based timing mechanisms that copy the functionality of hardware synchronized clocks. By implementing time tracking and coordination through software rather than requiring specialized hardware, the system achieves the necessary temporal coordination without increasing device complexity or cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical/hardware-based synchronized clock systems with software-based timing mechanisms. The control modules use software-implemented time tracking and coordination protocols to achieve the same temporal coordination that would traditionally require hardware synchronization, thereby reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If redundant transmission is used to ensure temporal properties, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguaranteed temporal propertiesVSAvoidtime until redundant transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system transmits the first data set preliminarily before the second data set, allowing the second data set to be prepared and transmitted in advance. This preliminary action reduces the effective response time while maintaining the reliability benefits of redundant transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial evaluation of the first data set immediately upon receipt, rather than waiting for complete confirmation. This partial action allows the system to respond faster while maintaining reliability through subsequent verification if the second data set arrives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4216004B1Control device and method for controlling an automated system
Publication Date: 2025.04.02 PILZ GMBH & CO KG
  • EP4216004B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4216004B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4216004B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Method and device for controlling an automated system. A communication channel connects a first control module (12) and a second control module (14) for the exchange of process data from the automated system. The first control module (12) generates process data at a first time t1, sends it to the second control module (14) via the communication channel, receives a response to the process data from the second control module (14), and processes it at a fourth time t4. The second control module (14) receives the process data from the first control module (12), processes it at a second time t2, generates the response at a third time t3, and sends it back to the first control module (12). The times t1, t2, t3, and t4 occur in chronological order.The first control module (12) and the second control module (14) together can guarantee a first minimum duration Δ1 between the first time t1 and the second time t2. The second control module (14) can guarantee a second minimum duration Δ2 between the second time t2 and the third time t3. The first control module (12) and the second control module (14) together can guarantee a third minimum duration Δ3 between the third time t3 and the fourth time t4.