Process Control Network Diagnostics for Safe Backup Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As process control systems become more complex, there is a need for a more intelligent and flexible approach to take components out of operation without compromising automation functions, especially in the presence of active network faults, to prevent the introduction of additional faults during maintenance or upgrades.

Innovation Solution

A diagnostics method is implemented to determine the network fault's impact on component connectivity, classifying components as 'primary', 'active backup', or 'inactive backup' using rule-based algorithms that evaluate network topology and protocols, ensuring safe component removal without disrupting communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a backup component is taken out of operation for maintenance or upgrades, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates because the component may be needed if a network fault occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent maintenanceVSAvoidautomation function
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnostics before maintenance to determine if a backup component is essential for connectivity. The diagnostics algorithm evaluates network topology and fault conditions in advance, allowing maintenance personnel to make informed decisions about component removal before it occurs, thus preventing reliability issues while enabling maintenance when safe

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback about the operational status and essentiality of backup components through diagnostics results. This feedback mechanism informs maintenance decisions by indicating whether removing a backup component would compromise connectivity, allowing operators to adjust maintenance plans based on real-time system state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If network diagnostics are implemented to determine component essentiality, then reliability is improved by preventing erroneous incapacitation, but device complexity increases due to additional diagnostic algorithms and processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent removal safetyVSAvoiddiagnostics system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network controllers perform self-diagnostics to determine their own essentiality for connectivity. Each controller runs the algorithm locally using available topology information and fault data, eliminating the need for external diagnostic systems and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The diagnostic algorithm leverages existing network controllers and their built-in topology knowledge to perform essentiality determination. The same controllers that manage network operations also execute the diagnostics, making the system self-sufficient and avoiding additional dedicated diagnostic hardware or software

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4593341A1Diagnostics for process control systems
Publication Date: 2025.07.30 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • EP4593341A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4593341A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4593341A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

There is provided a diagnostics method for a process control system. The process control system is configured to communicate with at least one network device via a network. The process control system comprises a first component and a second component. The method comprises running diagnostics on the network to determine whether a network fault renders the first component essential for the second component to connect to the at least one network device.