Control Panel Anti-Tamper Detection for Crash-and-Smash Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current security systems are vulnerable to the 'crash-and-smash' technique, where intruders destroy the control panel before it can alert authorities, leading to false alarms and security breaches.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating sensors and anti-tamper switches in the control panel to detect disruptions, such as impact forces or power loss, allowing it to send alerts to a remote monitoring service before being disabled, enabling timely intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the control panel implements an entry delay to allow authorized persons to disarm the system, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability deteriorates because intruders can destroy the control panel during the delay period

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control panel detects disruptions (impact, removal, power loss) and sends alerts to the back-end monitoring system before being completely disabled. This preliminary action allows the system to notify authorities of potential intrusions even though the intruder successfully destroyed the control panel during the entry delay period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a back-end monitoring system as an intermediary that receives alerts from the control panel and can contact emergency personnel independently. This intermediary ensures that even if the control panel is destroyed, the alert chain continues through the back-end system, resolving the reliability issue while maintaining the entry delay for authorized users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the control panel sends an immediate signal upon detecting an entry, then the reliability is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates because authorized persons cannot disarm the system in time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control panel performs preliminary detection of disruptions and sends alerts before the entry delay expires. This allows authorized persons to still disarm the system during the entry delay period while ensuring that potential intrusions are flagged and alerts are sent to the back-end system in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its response based on the situation. During the entry delay period, the system remains operational and allows disarming. However, if a disruption is detected, the system immediately sends an alert to the back-end monitoring system, creating a dynamic response that balances ease of operation with reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the control panel is designed to be compact and unobtrusive, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability deteriorates because it becomes more vulnerable to undetected destruction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple detection functions (impact sensing, removal detection, power loss detection) into a single integrated control panel system. This merging allows the compact control panel to maintain multiple protective capabilities without increasing its physical size or obtrusiveness, while still ensuring reliable detection of destruction attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control panel is designed with multi-functionality, incorporating various sensors and detection mechanisms that serve multiple purposes. The same compact unit that provides user interface functions also includes impact sensors, removal detection, and power monitoring, making it universally capable of detecting different destruction methods without requiring additional separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces false alarms and enhances security by promptly notifying authorities of potential intrusions, even if the control panel is damaged or destroyed, thereby improving the overall security system's reliability and responsiveness.

Implementation Method 1

The control panel may include an accelerometer or other sensor that detects a force applied to the control panel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS10482758B1Detecting destruction of an automation system component
Publication Date: 2019.11.19 VIVINT INC
  • US10482758B1 patent drawing
  • US10482758B1 patent drawing
  • US10482758B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control panel is used to monitor events within a security system or other automation system. In the event an intruder enters a physical location, the intruder may attempt to damage the control panel to disrupt its operation. One or more sensors of the control panel may detect disruption in the operation of the control panel. Example sensors may detect an impact force, sudden acceleration, removal from a mounted location, or disruption of communication with an input/output element, such as a display device. When an event is detected at the control panel itself, the control panel can send a signal to a remote service provider, and the remote service provider can follow-up with the customer. The control panel and/or remote service provider may also determine when the control panel loses partial or complete power loss to identify the disruption as a potential crash-and-smash entry.