Control space operating system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current growspace systems face high labor costs, inefficiency, lack of data granularity, inflexible automation, and difficulty in crop diversification due to expensive retooling and separate R&D facilities, leading to slow learning and high operational costs.

Innovation Solution

A control space operating system with modular, decoupled automation, robotic transport, and centralized data processing, allowing for flexible crop management, granular data collection, and scalable experimentation across different crop types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If traditional farming methods are used, then vast amounts of space are required, but labor costs and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefarming spaceVSAvoidlabor cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The farming system is divided into modular vertical units with standardized components (trays, irrigation modules, lighting zones) that can be independently managed and maintained, reducing the complexity of operating large-scale facilities while maintaining compact space utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Manual labor is replaced with automated systems including robotic harvesting mechanisms, automated irrigation controllers, and computer vision-based monitoring systems that track plant growth and health metrics, significantly reducing operational complexity despite increased automation infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If traditional soil-based farming is used, then farmers need extensive experience to manage water, but this increases the difficulty of operation and reduces scalability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The hydroponic system incorporates self-regulating irrigation modules with sensors that automatically monitor and adjust water delivery to plants based on real-time soil moisture readings and plant needs, eliminating the need for expert manual intervention and enabling straightforward scaling of operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from soil-based to hydroponic cultivation, fundamentally changing the physical state and delivery mechanism of water and nutrients, which simplifies control parameters and enables precise, scalable management through automated dosing systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If current growspace systems are used, then labor costs are high, but purchasing traditional manufacturing equipment to reduce labor is very expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor costVSAvoidequipment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multi-functional robotic units that can perform multiple tasks (harvesting, pruning, monitoring, transplanting) within the controlled environment, reducing the need for specialized expensive equipment for each function while significantly lowering labor requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamically reconfigurable robotic arms and movable platforms that can adapt their functionality through software control rather than requiring separate fixed installations for each operation, reducing capital equipment costs while maintaining operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If current growspace systems are used, then data gathering is manual and labor-intensive, but automated systems lack granular control and flexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata gathering efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor plant parameters (growth rate, nutrient uptake, health indicators) and automatically adjust environmental controls (lighting, temperature, humidity, nutrient delivery) in real-time, enabling both high productivity and granular control flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures multiple sensor types and data collection protocols before deployment, with automated routines that proactively monitor and record granular data across all zones, eliminating manual data gathering while maintaining adaptability through programmable parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

5Productivity

If current growspace systems are used, then R&D and production are separated in independent facilities, but this slows learning rates and increases operational costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning rateVSAvoidfacility structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates R&D and production operations within the same controlled environment facility, allowing real-time experimentation with different cultivation parameters alongside commercial production, accelerating knowledge transfer and reducing the need for separate research facilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12382886B2Control space operating system
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 HIPPO HARVEST INC
  • US12382886B2 patent drawing
  • US12382886B2 patent drawing
  • US12382886B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control space operating system. The system includes a control space with one or more data source zones and a control space manager. The control space manager can collect data and control different variables across different data source zones in order to determine optimal policies and conditions for data source growth and generation.