Agricultural Vehicle Control Unit Energy Check Before Application Run

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for monitoring the energy storage system in agricultural vehicles are complex and require battery sensors, which are expensive, and do not accurately predict the state of the battery, leading to potential power supply failures during applications.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method assesses the feasibility of applications on a control unit by comparing required energy parameters with available energy parameters from the storage device, preventing or allowing the application to run based on this comparison, without the need for a battery sensor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a battery sensor is used to monitor the energy storage system's condition, then the measurement precision of battery state is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery state measurementVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential measurement function from a dedicated battery sensor and implements it through existing control unit components that can calculate battery state parameters (voltage, current, temperature, state of charge) through mathematical processing of electrical signals already present in the system, eliminating the need for additional expensive sensors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the physical battery sensor hardware with a computational approach using the control unit's processor to calculate battery state parameters from electrical measurements, substituting a mechanical/sensor-based system with an electronic/computational system that achieves the same measurement precision without additional hardware complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If the control unit runs an application without sufficient energy assessment, then the productivity is improved, but the reliability of power supply deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication executionVSAvoidpower supply reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary assessment of the energy storage system's capacity and state of charge before allowing application execution on the control unit, calculating whether sufficient energy is available to complete the application without interruption, thereby ensuring power supply reliability while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the control unit continuously monitors the battery state parameters during application execution and can interrupt or terminate the application if the energy level drops below a threshold, ensuring that power supply reliability is maintained while allowing productive operation within safe limits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4681982A1Computer-implemented method
Publication Date: 2026.01.21 CLAAS E SYSTEMS GMBH
  • EP4681982A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4681982A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4681982A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a computer-implemented method for assessing the feasibility of applications (A) on a control unit (4) of an agricultural vehicle (1) supplied with energy by an electrical energy storage device (5), the method comprising determining (100) a first energy parameter (P1) based on an energy value (EA) required to carry out an application (A), and a second energy parameter (P2) based on an energy value (EB) available from the energy storage device (5), comparing (110) the first (P1) and second (P2) energy parameters, and preventing (120) or allowing (130) the execution of the application (A) depending on the comparison (110).