Control valve

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electric regulating valves in HVAC systems are unstable due to pressure fluctuations, require high-power actuators, and have poor precision, while existing PICVs face resistance and complexity in design.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical dynamic balancing electric regulating valve with a first valve assembly that allows rotational flow rate presetting and axial flow rate regulation without a pressure-leading passage, combined with a second pressure difference balancing valve assembly for automatic pressure balancing and reduced noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a conventional electric regulating valve is used, then the valve structure is simple, but the flow rate control precision deteriorates due to pressure fluctuations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate control precisionVSAvoidvalve structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve is divided into two independent assemblies: a first valve assembly for flow rate presetting and a second valve assembly for pressure balancing. This segmentation allows each assembly to perform its specific function independently, improving flow rate control precision while managing structural complexity through functional decomposition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A mechanical dynamic balancing mechanism is introduced as an intermediary between the electric actuator and the valve plug. This mechanism automatically compensates for pressure fluctuations, enabling precise flow rate control without requiring complex electronic pressure compensation systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If a mechanical dynamic balancing electric regulating valve is used, then flow rate control precision is improved, but the valve structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate control precisionVSAvoidvalve structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical dynamic balancing mechanism operates automatically using the fluid pressure itself to balance the valve plug. The system uses its own operating conditions (fluid pressure) to self-regulate, eliminating the need for external power sources or complex control systems, thus improving precision without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the flow rate presetting function and pressure balancing function into a single integrated valve body with two assemblies. This merging reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate valves, while maintaining high flow rate control precision through the mechanical balancing mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If a PICV with valve stem limiting is used, then flow rate presetting is achieved, but the valve stem stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate presetting capabilityVSAvoidvalve stem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The valve stem functions are segmented: the first valve stem is dedicated to flow rate presetting through rotational movement of the slider, while the second valve stem handles pressure balancing. This separation eliminates the conflicting requirements of limiting and guiding functions, improving valve stem stability while maintaining presetting capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using the valve stem to simultaneously perform limiting and guiding functions (which causes instability), the patent inverts the approach by using the valve body structure (valve seat with circumferential opening) to provide the limiting function, freeing the valve stem to专注于 guiding and actuation, thereby improving stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Reliability

If a PICV with high-power actuator is used, then pressure balancing is achieved, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure balancing capabilityVSAvoidactuator power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical dynamic balancing mechanism uses the fluid pressure differential itself to drive the balancing action. The higher pressure fluid automatically pushes the valve plug to the position needed for balancing, eliminating the need for high-power actuators and significantly reducing energy consumption while maintaining reliable pressure balancing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces electric pressure compensation mechanisms with a purely mechanical dynamic balancing system. The mechanical structure automatically responds to pressure changes through force balance on the valve plug, eliminating the need for powered actuators and reducing energy consumption while maintaining pressure balancing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides stable and precise flow rate control, independent of system pressure, with reduced complexity and increased service life, while maintaining dynamic balancing functionality even without electricity.

Implementation Method 1

a slider, disposed inside the valve seat and being movable in a circumferential direction of the sidewall of the valve seat, in order to partially or completely block the opening in the sidewall of the valve seat in the circumferential direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow rate control through mechanical blocking:

Implementation Method 2

a regulating valve plug, being in the shape of a cylinder having an opening at one end, being arranged to surround the valve seat concentrically, and being movable in the axial direction of the valve seat, in order to partially or completely block the opening in the sidewall of the valve seat in the axial direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow rate regulation through axial blocking:

Implementation Method 3

A mechanical dynamic balancing electric regulating valve enables the regulating valve to automatically balance the effect of system pressure on flow rate during actual operation of the system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical dynamic balancing:

Data Source

PatentEP3502823B1Control valve
Publication Date: 2020.03.25 SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG
  • EP3502823B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3502823B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3502823B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Control valve. Provided in an embodiment of the present disclosure is a control valve, comprising: a valve body (110), a first valve assembly (120) and a first valve stem (125). The first valve assembly comprises: a valve seat (121), fixed to the valve body, with a circumferentially extending opening (1212) being provided in a sidewall of the valve seat; a slider (123), disposed inside the valve seat (121) and being able to partially or completely block the opening (1212) in the sidewall of the valve seat in the circumferential direction, but being stationary relative to the valve seat (121) in an axial direction (Z); a regulating valve plug (124), being arranged to surround the valve seat (121) concentrically, and being able to partially or completely block the opening (1212) in the sidewall of the valve seat in the axial direction (Z) of the valve seat.