Controllable Tracker Server P2P File Transmission Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

P2P file transmission significantly consumes network bandwidth, leading to network congestion, performance degradation, and user dissatisfaction due to the lack of effective rate-limiting and directing schemes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a controllable tracker server to manage P2P file transmission by modifying the node list based on predetermined rules, replacing the original tracker server, and ensuring that only nodes within the same region or meeting specific criteria are used for file transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If P2P file transmission is allowed without management, then file transfer efficiency is improved, but network congestion and performance degradation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefile transfer efficiencyVSAvoidnetwork congestion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a tracker server as an intermediary component that coordinates P2P file transmission. The tracker server manages node lists, matches uploaders and downloaders, and controls transmission flow without being part of the direct file transfer path. This mediator approach enables efficient P2P transmission while preventing network congestion through centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts transmission parameters such as node list selection, bandwidth allocation, and peer matching criteria through the tracker server. By changing these parameters based on network conditions and user requirements, the system optimizes file transfer efficiency while controlling network load to prevent congestion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If original tracker server is used for P2P coordination, then node list availability is improved, but network security and controllability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenode list availabilityVSAvoidnetwork security
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a controllable tracker server as a secure intermediary between users and the original tracker server. This mediator retrieves node lists from the original tracker server, applies security filtering and access control rules, then provides the filtered information to users. This approach maintains node list availability while enhancing network security through the additional control layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The controllable tracker server performs preliminary security checks and node list filtering before distributing information to users. By pre-processing and validating node lists in advance, the system ensures that only secure and authorized nodes are made available, preventing security issues while maintaining comprehensive node availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If rate-limiting and directing schemes are implemented, then network load control is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork loadVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tracker server serves as a centralized intermediary that handles all rate-limiting and directing functions. Instead of implementing complex control logic in each peer or distributed across multiple components, the tracker server consolidates these functions in a single location, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining effective network load control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the tracker server monitors network conditions, transmission rates, and node performance, then adjusts rate limits and directing rules accordingly. This automated feedback loop enables effective network load management without requiring complex manual configuration or intervention, reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10623484B2P2P file transmission management method and system
Publication Date: 2020.04.14 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10623484B2 patent drawing
  • US10623484B2 patent drawing
  • US10623484B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An efficient, flexible P2P file transmission management technology for limiting and directing of P2P file transmission mainly by replacing an original tracker server with a setting controllable tracker server, and modifying node list based on predetermined rule in the controllable tracker server. With the present invention, a network operator can strengthen function of the controllable tracker server in P2P communication gradually by weakening function of the original tracker server in P2P communication gradually, and utilize various rules or policies established in advance to manage file transfer of P2P nodes.