Hot-Stamped Coated Steel Pre-Coating to Reduce Roller Fouling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing coated steels used in hot-stamping processes face issues with roller fouling due to insufficient intermetallic alloying and non-uniform pre-coating thickness, leading to decreased productivity and poor weldability.

Innovation Solution

Control the pre-coating thickness of aluminum or aluminum alloy on coated steel strips to within a specific range (20-33 micrometers) to ensure uniform alloying and minimize roller fouling, and optimize heating and cooling rates to achieve a homogeneous martensitic structure for improved weldability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the pre-coating thickness is not controlled uniformly, then the alloying between coating and substrate is insufficient, but the roller fouling increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealloying qualityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the pre-coating thickness within a specific range (20-33 micrometers) and adjusting heating parameters (temperature range, holding time) to achieve optimal alloying. This controlled parameter approach ensures complete consumption of the pre-coating layer during heating, preventing roller fouling while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by ensuring uniform pre-coating thickness distribution across the steel sheet surface. This uniformity guarantees consistent alloying behavior in different regions of the blank during heating, preventing localized excessive coating that would cause roller fouling and maintaining overall process efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the pre-coating thickness is excessive or non-uniform, then the intermetallic alloying is insufficient, but the roller fouling occurs and maintenance frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintermetallic alloyingVSAvoidroller fouling
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by changing the pre-coating thickness parameter to a controlled range (20-33 micrometers) and adjusting heating parameters (temperature, holding time) to ensure complete alloying. This prevents excessive coating material from causing roller fouling while achieving sufficient intermetallic alloying for high-temperature resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by controlling the pre-coating thickness before the hot-stamping process. By pre-establishing the optimal coating thickness and uniformity, the patent ensures that during subsequent heating, the coating will be completely consumed through alloying, preventing roller fouling before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the pre-coating thickness is not controlled, then the alloying is insufficient, but the weldability of the stamped parts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealloying completenessVSAvoidweldability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling pre-coating thickness (20-33 micrometers) and heating parameters to achieve complete alloying. This creates a controlled transition layer that improves weldability by preventing excessive intermetallic formation that would occur with uncontrolled thicker coatings, while ensuring sufficient alloying for high-temperature resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Stability of the object's composition

If the heating and cooling rates are not optimized, then the martensitic structure is not homogeneous, but the mechanical properties of the stamped parts are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemartensitic structure homogeneityVSAvoidmechanical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing heating rate, holding time at austenitizing temperature, and cooling rate. These controlled parameter changes ensure homogeneous martensitic transformation throughout the blank, achieving both structural homogeneity and high mechanical properties in the final stamped parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The controlled pre-coating thickness and optimized processing conditions result in reduced roller fouling, enhanced weldability, and improved mechanical properties of the stamped parts, allowing for high resistance to corrosion and abrasion.

Implementation Method 1

alloying of the pre-coating with the steel substrate, which has the effect of creating intermetallic alloys with high melting temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIntermetallic alloying: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

austenitizing of the steel substrate takes place

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAustenitizing: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

Hot forming followed by rapid cooling of the part in order to obtain predominantly martensitic structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMartensitic transformation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS12454737B2Method of forming a hot stamped coated steel product
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 ARCELORMITTAL SA
  • US12454737B2 patent drawing
  • US12454737B2 patent drawing
  • US12454737B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hot stamped coated steel product, the hot stamped coated steel product comprising: a base steel; and a coating having a thickness of including, proceeding from the base steel outwards: (a) an interdiffusion layer, (b) an intermediate layer, (c) an intermetallic layer, and (d) a superficial layer, the base steel having a composition comprising: 0.15%<carbon<0.5%; 0.5%<manganese<3%; 0.1%<silicon<0.5%; 0.01%<chromium<1%; titanium<0.2%; aluminum<0.1%; phosphorus<0.1%; sulfur<0.05%; 0.0005%<boron<0.08%; a weight ratio of titanium content with respect to the nitrogen content being in excess of 3.42; a remainder being iron and impurities inherent in processing.