Controller Driver Signaling Using Shared Pin

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In motor control systems, existing technologies require multiple pins for dedicated signal communication between controllers and drivers, leading to increased package size and complexity, while also lacking effective fault monitoring and isolation switch control.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for quad-level or tri-level signaling between a controller and a driver, where a command signal determines the state of an isolation switch, and a fault signal is generated simultaneously, using a gate drive circuit and monitor circuit to manage field effect transistors and indicate undervoltage conditions, reducing the need for separate pins and enhancing safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple dedicated pins are used for signal communication between controller and driver, then signal transmission reliability is improved, but package size and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal transmission reliabilityVSAvoidpackage size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple signal functions (command signal transmission and fault status indication) into a single shared pin between controller and driver. The driver uses the same pin that receives command signals to also output fault status signals, eliminating the need for separate dedicated pins for each function and reducing overall package complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The shared pin serves multiple purposes: it functions as an input pin for receiving command signals from the controller during normal operation, and simultaneously as an output pin for transmitting fault status signals from the driver to the controller. This multi-functional use of the pin reduces the total number of pins required in the package.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If separate dedicated pins are used for command and fault signals, then signal communication clarity is improved, but the number of pins required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal communication clarityVSAvoidnumber of pins
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The driver periodically monitors the command signal voltage levels and generates fault signals at appropriate times (substantially simultaneously with receiving the command signal when fault conditions are detected). This timing-based approach ensures clear signal communication while using the same pin for both command and fault functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses voltage level parameters to distinguish between different signal types. The command signal uses specific voltage levels to indicate desired switch states, while fault signals use different voltage levels (above first threshold or below second threshold) to indicate fault conditions. This parameter-based differentiation maintains signal clarity despite sharing the same physical pin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If isolation switch control is added to enhance safety, then system safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem safetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The driver circuit includes an integrated monitor circuit that automatically monitors the command signal voltage levels and detects fault conditions without requiring external monitoring components. When a fault is detected (voltage outside acceptable ranges), the monitor circuit automatically generates a fault signal on the shared pin, enabling self-diagnosis and safety protection within the driver itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by having the driver continuously monitor command signal voltage levels and provide feedback about fault conditions through the same shared pin. The controller receives this feedback and can take appropriate action to prevent unsafe operation, creating a closed-loop safety mechanism that enhances system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9935452B2Circuits and techniques for signaling between devices
Publication Date: 2018.04.03 ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS LLC
  • US9935452B2 patent drawing
  • US9935452B2 patent drawing
  • US9935452B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for signaling between a controller and a driver includes receiving, at a pin of the driver coupled to the controller, a command signal generated by the controller and generating, by the driver at the pin coupled to the controller, a fault signal indicating a fault condition. The driver can be configured to drive a switch and the command signal can be configured to cause the driver to open the switch when the command signal is in a first state and to close the switch when the command signal is in a second state. The command signal being in the first state may correspond to the command signal having a voltage level above a first predetermined threshold and the command signal being in the second state may correspond to the command signal having a voltage level below a second predetermined threshold.