Interpretable Controller Decision Logic for Adaptive Power Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in modern industrial automation control systems, particularly in power transmission and distribution systems, is the complexity of designing protection logic that adapts to changing grid environments due to converter-interfaced generation and e-mobility, which introduces stochasticity and requires frequent reevaluation, while existing machine learning approaches lack interpretability for human engineers.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based decision logic generation method that decomposes the learning process into interpretable sub-processes, using checkpoints to visualize and verify the decision-making process, allowing human engineers to trace and adjust the logic effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If machine learning is used to generate decision logic, then the system can adapt to changing grid environments, but the decision logic becomes uninterpretable to human engineers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing grid environmentsVSAvoidinterpretability of decision logic
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the machine learning decision-making process into multiple interpretable sub-processes with defined checkpoints. Each sub-process handles a specific aspect of the decision logic, allowing human engineers to trace and understand the reasoning path while maintaining the adaptability benefits of machine learning for changing grid environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If conventional protection logic is designed by human engineers, then the decision logic is interpretable, but the system cannot adapt frequently to changing grid conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpretability of decision logicVSAvoidadaptability to changing grid environments
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer that bridges human-engineered interpretability requirements and machine learning adaptability. This intermediary structure provides checkpoints where human engineers can verify and understand the decision logic while the underlying machine learning models continue to adapt to changing grid conditions through automated retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If protection logic is reevaluated frequently due to grid changes, then the system adapts to new conditions, but the design complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency of reevaluationVSAvoidcomplexity of protection logic design
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic protection logic system where the decision logic can be automatically retrained and updated in response to changing grid conditions. The segmented architecture with checkpoints allows for efficient reevaluation without requiring complete redesign, reducing the complexity burden of frequent adaptations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If protection logic is reevaluated frequently due to grid changes, then the system adapts to new conditions, but the design time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency of reevaluationVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary segmentation of the decision logic into modular sub-processes with defined checkpoints during the initial design phase. This preliminary structuring enables faster subsequent reevaluations and retrainings when grid conditions change, as the modular architecture can be updated incrementally rather than requiring complete redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12353175B2Method and computer system for generating a decision logic for a controller
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 HITACHI ENERGY LTD
  • US12353175B2 patent drawing
  • US12353175B2 patent drawing
  • US12353175B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Machine learning, ML, using labeled data is performed to thereby train a ML model to generate decision logic for a controller of an IACS, in particular a power system controller. The ML model has ML model inputs and ML model outputs. The ML model is decomposed into a plurality of computational sub-processes, wherein intermediate signals output by one of the computational sub-processes are input into a consecutive one of the computational sub-processes. Information on the trained ML model is generated based on the intermediate signals and is output for interpretation, verification, visualization, and/or inspection of at least one of the computational sub-processes.