Controller Peripheral Visual Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for lighting and building management lack effective peripheral visual feedback, leading to errors in user input interpretation, especially in systems with multiple zones or relying on tactile feedback.

Innovation Solution

A control pod with a cover plate featuring a light transmissive area around its perimeter, equipped with a user input sensor, a selectively controllable light source, and a processor that provides visual feedback through light patterns corresponding to user inputs, enhancing user interaction and system status indication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If tactile feedback mechanisms (mechanical switches or panels) are used for user input, then the controller can receive user commands, but the user experience deteriorates when the user is unclear of the status or function of an input

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser input clarityVSAvoidstatus feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements visual feedback through LED indicators that provide real-time status information to users. The system displays whether inputs are recognized, what mode the system is in, and confirms command execution, eliminating the uncertainty associated with tactile-only interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses different colored LED indicators to communicate system status and input recognition. Color changes provide intuitive visual cues about the current state of the controller and the validity of user inputs, making the system status immediately apparent without requiring tactile exploration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the controller interface provides comprehensive control options for multiple zones, then the system functionality increases, but the complexity of the interface increases making it harder to understand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-zone control capabilityVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the control interface into distinct visual segments corresponding to different zones. Each zone has its own visual indicators and status display, allowing users to understand and control multiple zones independently without being overwhelmed by a monolithic complex interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different visual characteristics to different parts of the interface corresponding to different zones. Each zone receives customized visual feedback appropriate to its function, making the overall complex system understandable through localized, zone-specific visual cues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides clear and intuitive visual feedback, reducing errors in user input interpretation and improving the usability of control systems, especially in complex environments with multiple zones.

Implementation Method 1

a selectively controllable light source coupled to the light transmissive area substantially along the outer perimeter of the cover plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight Emitting Diode: Light Emitting Diode

Data Source

PatentUS10375807B1Controller with peripheral visual feedback
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 ABL IP HLDG LLC
  • US10375807B1 patent drawing
  • US10375807B1 patent drawing
  • US10375807B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control pod includes a controller to control an environmental condition in a space, and a cover plate covering the controller and having a light transmissive area extending along a substantial section of an outer perimeter of the cover plate. Programming configures a processor to detect user inputs of a control command based on a user action detected via user input response sensors, and based on the detected control command, send a control signal to a device to implement a function corresponding to the detected control command. The processor also controls a light source to selectively provide a light output through the light transmissive area of the cover plate for a period of time following the control command detection, as visible feedback corresponding to the detected control command, for observation by the user, along at least a portion of the section of the light transmissive area of the cover plate.