Automated Controller Protocol Enforcement System
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Smart contracts face significant performance limitations, including high latency and lack of scalability, making them unsuitable for time-critical and large-scale financial applications, particularly in business-to-business commerce and systems-of-systems.
Innovation Solution
The proposed system and method for enforcing contract/protocol/law execution utilize a controller provider managing automated controllers, a ledger for storing event representations, and an inspector to evaluate compliance with the protocol, achieving low latency and strong scalability.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If smart contracts use blockchain consensus mechanism, then security and reliability are improved, but transaction frequency and scalability deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments the enforcement mechanism into multiple independent automated controllers, each capable of independently verifying and enforcing protocol compliance. This eliminates the single-point consensus bottleneck of blockchain while maintaining distributed verification through parallel controller operations.
Solution Approach 2:
An inspector component acts as an intermediary that monitors and verifies the operations of automated controllers against the protocol. This intermediary layer provides centralized verification without requiring all controllers to reach consensus, enabling faster transaction processing while maintaining reliability.
2Measurement precision
If smart contracts verify transactions sequentially, then verification accuracy is improved, but latency deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The verification process is segmented into independent controller instances that can operate in parallel. Each controller independently verifies its assigned transactions with full accuracy, eliminating the sequential bottleneck while maintaining verification precision through distributed parallel processing.
Solution Approach 2:
The system dynamically allocates verification tasks across multiple automated controllers based on workload demands. This dynamic parallel verification maintains accuracy through independent validation while reducing latency by processing multiple transactions simultaneously rather than sequentially.
3Device complexity
If smart contracts operate on a single blockchain, then system simplicity is improved, but interoperability deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The automated controllers are designed with universal protocol verification capabilities that can enforce multiple different protocols across various blockchain networks. This multi-functional design enables a single controller instance to operate across different blockchains without requiring separate specialized systems for each network.
Solution Approach 2:
The inspector serves as a universal intermediary that can verify protocol compliance across multiple blockchain types and protocols. This intermediary layer abstracts the complexity of multi-chain interoperability, allowing automated controllers to enforce protocols across different blockchains while maintaining relative system simplicity through a unified verification approach.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems and methods for enforcing contract/protocol/law execution have a wide range of applicability. Embodiments have very low latency between a transaction and its validation and have strong scalability. An embodiment is a system for enforcing execution of a protocol among a plurality of parties. The example system includes (i) a controller provider configured to manage a plurality of automated controllers, (ii) a ledger, and (iii) an inspector. The controllers correspond to the plurality of parties. Each controller is configured to enforce execution of the protocol using a computer program integrated with the controller. The controller provider intercepts messages sent or received by the controllers and stores them in the ledger, representing history of events or operations between the parties, and the treatment of those events or operations by the controllers. The inspector accesses the ledger and evaluates whether representations of events or operations stored therein comply with the protocol.