Controller Alarm Handling for Soft Error Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to effectively manage alarms caused by soft errors in semiconductor circuits, leading to unnecessary handling by administrators due to automatic recovery mechanisms that do not promptly inform users when handling is not required.

Innovation Solution

A controller system that collects data, detects anomalies likely caused by soft errors, executes appropriate actions, and notifies users with masked or permissioned alarms to reduce unnecessary handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an alarm is generated for every anomaly detected in processor modules or IOMs, then reliability of anomaly detection is improved, but unnecessary handling by administrators increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection reliabilityVSAvoidadministrator handling workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary evaluation mechanism that sits between anomaly detection and alarm generation. This intermediary assesses whether detected anomalies are actual failures or transient soft errors, and only triggers alarms for genuine failures. This resolves the contradiction by filtering out false positives while maintaining detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automatic recovery mechanisms for soft errors. When transient errors are detected, the system automatically attempts recovery without administrator intervention, and only escalates to alarm generation when recovery fails. This reduces unnecessary handling while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automatic recovery mechanisms are implemented for soft errors, then productivity is improved by reducing manual intervention, but information loss occurs when users are not notified of errors requiring attention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem automation levelVSAvoiderror notification to user
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system continuously monitors recovery status and provides appropriate notifications to users. When automatic recovery succeeds, users are informed of the successful resolution. When recovery fails and alarm generation is triggered, users receive notification of the persistent error requiring attention. This resolves the information loss while maintaining high automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If all alarms are notified to users, then loss of information is reduced by ensuring users know about all anomalies, but ease of operation deteriorates due to alarm fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror information communicationVSAvoiduser response to alarms
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the notification quality based on error type. For transient soft errors, minimal or no notification is provided since they are automatically recovered. For persistent failures requiring intervention, clear and specific notifications are sent. This selective notification approach reduces alarm fatigue while maintaining essential information communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260023378A1Controller, control method, and non-transitory computer-readable recording medium
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 YOKOGAWA ELECTRIC CORP
  • US20260023378A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023378A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023378A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller includes a processor configured to collect data from a device that is included in a system, detect an anomaly that has occurred in at least one of a processor module and an input output module based on the collected data, execute an action on an alarm that indicates the anomaly when the detected anomaly is likely to be caused by a soft error, and notify a user of the alarm on which the action is executed.