Vehicle Controller Switching via Tire-Force Transition Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Switching between controllers in vehicle control systems can lead to unwanted oscillations, accelerations, and instabilities, affecting vehicle operation and safety, and results in inefficiencies such as increased energy losses, tyre wear, and decreased grip.

Innovation Solution

A method and system where control of an operation parameter of a motion support device is switched from a first controller to a second controller via an intermediate third controller, optimizing the transition by accounting for tyre forces produced by each controller, using a model predictive controller to ensure smooth transitions and minimize differences in allocated and requested tyre forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If control is switched directly from the first controller to the second controller, then the switching operation is simple and fast, but unwanted oscillations, accelerations, and instabilities occur affecting vehicle operation and safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching timeVSAvoidvehicle operation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A third controller is introduced as an intermediary between the first and second controllers to manage the transition. The third controller receives the control signal from the first controller and generates a modified control signal for the second controller, ensuring a smooth transition that avoids oscillations and instabilities while maintaining vehicle safety and operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If direct controller switching is performed, then the control system response is quick, but energy losses increase and tyre wear accelerates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol response speedVSAvoidenergy losses
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The third controller performs preliminary actions by pre-processing the control signal before it reaches the second controller. It anticipates the effects of direct switching and prepares compensatory control actions in advance, thereby reducing energy losses and minimizing tyre wear while maintaining quick control response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If direct controller switching is performed, then the switching process is straightforward, but tyre grip decreases and vehicle safety is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching simplicityVSAvoidtyre grip loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The third controller implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring the vehicle's operational parameters and the effects of control transitions. It uses this feedback information to adjust the control signal sent to the second controller, ensuring that tyre grip is maintained and vehicle safety is preserved throughout the switching process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240400067A1Switching between controllers for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • US20240400067A1 patent drawing
  • US20240400067A1 patent drawing
  • US20240400067A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for switching between a first controller and a second controller for a vehicle includes in a first operation stage, controlling an operational parameter of at least one MSD of the vehicle using the first controller, thereby providing a first tire force at at least one tire associated with the MSD, determining a second tire force for the at least one tire based on a vehicle model associated with the second controller, in a second operation stage, controlling the operational parameter of the at least one MSD using a third controller, comprising determining an intermediate value for the operational parameter based on the first and second tire forces, and in a third operation stage, controlling the operational parameter of the at least one MSD using the second controller, thereby providing the second tire force at the at least one tire.