Automated Controversy Detection in Advertisements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting controversial advertisements are inefficient, relying on test audiences and lacking clear criteria, which can lead to unintended negative public reactions and potential boycotts, especially in the context of online viral content where user-generated data is uncontrolled.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for automatically detecting controversy in advertisements by extracting semantic and linguistic features from user comments to construct a classifier, determining the percentage of controversial comments, and generating a controversy score to assess the likelihood of a publication causing controversy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If test audiences are used to detect controversial advertisements, then some feedback can be obtained, but the detection is inefficient and lacks clear criteria leading to unintended negative reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of controversy detectionVSAvoidefficiency of controversy detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/manual test audience method with an automated computer-based system that uses natural language processing, machine learning classifiers, and algorithmic analysis of user comments and social media data to detect controversy automatically, thereby improving both efficiency and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated controversy detection system that acts as a mediator between advertisement publication and public reaction, analyzing user feedback through structured criteria and providing early warning before negative perceptions spread virally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If clear criteria for controversy detection are established, then detection accuracy improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclarity of controversy detection criteriaVSAvoidcomplexity of detection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the controversy detection task into distinct components: data collection from multiple sources, preprocessing and cleaning, feature extraction, classification using trained models, and scoring. Each component has clear, defined criteria and operations, making the overall complex system manageable and interpretable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative controversy assessment into quantitative measurement by defining specific parameters such as controversy scores, sentiment polarity, emotional intensity metrics, and confidence thresholds, enabling precise measurement while maintaining systematic complexity through parameterized models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If user-generated data from online platforms is monitored, then real-time controversy detection is possible, but the volume of data to be analyzed increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to detect controversyVSAvoidvolume of user comments to analyze
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and cleaning user comments immediately upon collection, removing duplicates, filtering spam, and standardizing formats before the main analysis phase, thereby reducing the volume of data requiring intensive processing while enabling real-time detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the relevant features and key information from large volumes of user comments using natural language processing techniques, focusing on sentiment indicators, emotional keywords, and controversy-related patterns while discarding redundant information, thus analyzing essential content efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If automated classification of comments is implemented, then detection speed increases, but the need for training data and model development increases complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of controversy detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of classifier development
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by collecting and labeling training data in advance, training the classification models beforehand with diverse examples of controversial and non-controversial comments, and storing pre-trained models for rapid deployment, thereby enabling fast real-time detection without performing complex training during operational phase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating multiple classification models trained on different datasets and perspectives, ensembling their predictions to improve accuracy while distributing the computational complexity across multiple simpler models rather than one highly complex model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10049380B2Controversy detector
Publication Date: 2018.08.14 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US10049380B2 patent drawing
  • US10049380B2 patent drawing
  • US10049380B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In the examples provided herein, a controversy detection system includes a classifier engine to classify each of a plurality of comments about a publication as controversial or non-controversial. The system also includes a controversy detector engine to determine, based on the classification of the plurality of comments, whether the publication is controversial or non-controversial.