Convection Oven State-Based Parameter Control for Energy Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rack ovens operate with high precision parameters during both cooking and idle states, leading to inefficient energy use and reduced equipment life.

Innovation Solution

A controller system that distinguishes between cooking and idle states, using separate sets of operating parameter values to optimize heating and fan system operations, including hysteresis temperature and fan duration settings, to enhance energy efficiency and extend oven life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high precision operating parameters are used during both cook and idle states, then cooking quality is improved, but energy efficiency deteriorates and equipment life is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking qualityVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the operating parameters adjustable based on the operational state. The controller dynamically switches between a first set of parameters during cook state and a second set of parameters during idle state, allowing the system to adapt its behavior to current conditions rather than operating with fixed high-precision parameters at all times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent directly implements parameter changes by storing and switching between different sets of operating parameters. The first set includes tighter temperature control and longer fan operation for quality cooking, while the second set includes relaxed parameters for energy-efficient idle maintenance, directly resolving the contradiction through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If high precision operating parameters are used during both cook and idle states, then cooking quality is improved, but equipment life is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking qualityVSAvoidequipment life
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters based on state, reducing the stress on heating and fan systems during idle periods by using relaxed parameters in the second set, thereby extending equipment life while maintaining cooking quality when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By changing parameters during idle state (reducing heating intensity, adjusting fan operation), the patent reduces wear and tear on components, directly addressing equipment life concerns while preserving the ability to deliver high-quality cooking when in cook state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the oven maintains temperature during idle state with same parameters as cook state, then readiness for cooking is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereadiness for cookingVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes energy consumption during idle state by using a second set of parameters with relaxed temperature control bands and adjusted fan operation compared to the first set used during cooking, thereby reducing energy consumption while still maintaining readiness for the next cooking cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

During idle state, the patent applies partial action by maintaining only sufficient temperature readiness rather than full cooking temperature, using relaxed parameters that provide just enough heat and air circulation to prepare for the next cook state without the full energy expenditure of active cooking parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for reduced energy consumption and less wear on the oven systems by adjusting heating and fan usage based on operational states, thereby improving overall efficiency and extending equipment life.

Implementation Method 1

rack ovens utilizing electric heating elements (e.g., resistive heaters)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistive heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

one or more fans to move heated air within the oven (e.g., air moves across the heat-exchange tubes and through the cooking chamber over the food product)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS12044415B2Convection oven
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US12044415B2 patent drawing
  • US12044415B2 patent drawing
  • US12044415B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An oven includes a cooking chamber for receiving food product to be cooked, a door movable between an open condition and a closed condition relative to the cooking cavity, a heating system for generating heat and a fan system for moving heated air through the cooking cavity. A controller is configured for controlling the heating system and the fan system. The controller includes an associated memory storing a first set of operating parameter values and a second set of operating parameter values. The controller is configured to identify whether the oven is in the cook state or the idle state. The controller uses the first set of operating parameter values to control the heating system and the fan system during the cook state, and uses the second set of operating parameter values to control the heating system and the fan system during the idle state.