Converged Cryptographic Engine Consolidation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The presence of multiple cryptographic engines on a platform leads to unnecessary power consumption, increased area usage, and design complexity, along with duplication of Intellectual Property blocks and maintenance costs due to differing design teams and requirements for side channel resistance and post-quantum resistance.

Innovation Solution

A Converged Cryptographic Engine (CCE) is introduced, which combines all cryptographic engines into a single engine on the memory interface, utilizing a special instruction for encryption/decryption of data between storage devices and main memory, and supports advanced encryption standards like AES-XTS, reducing the number of engines and simplifying design and maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple cryptographic engines are present at different locations on a platform, then security coverage is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent consolidates multiple cryptographic engines into a single Converged Cryptographic Engine (CCE) located at the memory interface. This single engine handles encryption and decryption for both main memory and storage devices, eliminating the need for separate cryptographic engines at different platform locations while maintaining comprehensive security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The CCE is designed as a universal cryptographic engine that can serve multiple functions: protecting main memory, protecting storage devices, and handling data transfers between them. This multi-functional design allows one engine to replace multiple specialized engines, reducing overall power consumption while maintaining security across all data locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple cryptographic engines are present at different locations on a platform, then security coverage is improved, but area usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidarea usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple cryptographic engines into a single CCE instance at the memory interface. This consolidation physically reduces the silicon area required by eliminating redundant cryptographic engine implementations across different platform components, while the single engine maintains security coverage for all data paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If multiple cryptographic engines are present at different locations on a platform, then security coverage is improved, but design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple cryptographic engines into a single CCE, which dramatically simplifies the design architecture. Instead of coordinating multiple separate engines with different design requirements, the system now manages one unified engine with consistent design standards, reducing overall design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The CCE is designed as a universal engine that handles multiple security functions (main memory protection, storage device protection, data transfer encryption) through a single standardized interface and control mechanism. This universality eliminates the need to design and integrate multiple specialized engines with different requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If multiple cryptographic engines are present at different locations on a platform, then security coverage is improved, but maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidmaintenance costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent consolidates multiple cryptographic engines into a single CCE, which reduces maintenance costs by eliminating the need to maintain separate engine instances. With only one engine to update, patch, and troubleshoot, maintenance efforts and associated costs are significantly reduced while security coverage remains comprehensive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4016358A1Storage encryption using converged cryptographic engine
Publication Date: 2022.06.22 INTEL CORP
  • EP4016358A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4016358A1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4016358A1 patent drawingFigure 2~5

AI summary

Methods and apparatus relating to a Converged Cryptographic Engine (CCE) for storage encryption are described. In an embodiment, decode circuitry decodes an instruction to determine whether Converged Cryptographic Engine (CCE) circuitry is enabled. Execution circuitry executes the instruction to program a plurality of keys in response to the CCE circuitry being enabled. The CCE circuitry performs all encryption and all decryption of data to be transferred between a memory and a storage device based at least in part on at least one of the plurality of keys. Other embodiments are also disclosed and claimed.