Converged Infrastructure Configuration Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge lies in efficiently configuring and validating converged infrastructure components, as existing methods require multiple customer interactions, lead to inconsistent quality analysis, and often reveal errors only after configuration has begun, increasing time and expenses.

Innovation Solution

A system and method involving a survey tool to collect and validate configuration parameters, followed by an automation tool generating scripts for configuring converged infrastructure components based on customer specifications, ensuring high-quality and consistent configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual quality analysis is performed on configuration information, then flexibility in handling diverse customer requirements is maintained, but consistency and reliability of the analysis deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in handling diverse customer requirementsVSAvoidconsistency of quality analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated validation rules and quality checks that operate without human intervention. The configuration information is automatically validated against predefined rules, ensuring consistent quality analysis while maintaining adaptability through configurable validation parameters that can be adjusted for different customer requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by transitioning from manual analysis to automated validation using configurable rules. The validation rules can be modified to accommodate different customer requirements, providing both consistency through automation and adaptability through parameter configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If configuration validation is performed early in the process, then errors are detected sooner reducing rework, but the complexity of the validation process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to detect errorsVSAvoidcomplexity of validation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation process is segmented into multiple independent validation rules that can be executed separately. Each rule validates a specific aspect of the configuration information, making the overall complex validation process manageable through modular, discrete validation steps that can be performed early without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Preliminary validation actions are performed on configuration information before full configuration begins. The system executes validation rules upfront to detect errors early, preventing downstream rework while managing complexity through staged validation that prepares the data for subsequent configuration steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If multiple exchanges with the customer are conducted to gather configuration information, then completeness of information is improved, but the time and resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of configuration informationVSAvoidtime for information collection
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of configuration information as it is being collected, rather than waiting for multiple customer exchanges. This early validation identifies missing or incomplete information immediately, allowing for efficient information gathering in a single interaction while ensuring completeness through automated checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides immediate feedback on the completeness and quality of configuration information through automated validation. This feedback mechanism allows the customer to provide complete information in a single exchange, as the system promptly identifies and requests corrections for any deficiencies, eliminating the need for multiple back-and-forth interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11087340B1Systems and methods for configuring converged infrastructure components
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US11087340B1 patent drawing
  • US11087340B1 patent drawing
  • US11087340B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations described and claimed herein provide systems and methods for configuring one or more components of a converged infrastructure for a customer. In one implementation, a survey including configuration parameters for the one or more components of the converged infrastructure is received. The configuration parameters are collected in the survey using a survey tool accessible with a user device over a network. The configuration parameters are based on input from the customer including customer specifications for the converged infrastructure. The configuration parameters are validated, and at least one script for the one or more components is generated. The script includes instructions for configuring the one or more components based on the validated configuration parameters.