Convergent Fin and Nanosheet Transistor Layout for Tight Gate Spacing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In advanced semiconductor technology nodes, the scaling of integrated circuits is constrained by layout restrictions on spacing between gate isolation structures and neighboring semiconductor fins, limiting the density and complexity of FinFET and GAAFET devices.

Innovation Solution

A fabrication process that forms FinFETs and GAAFETs in a single IC cell, such as a static random access memory (SRAM) cell, using a convergent scheme that employs double-patterning or multi-patterning processes to improve spacing constraints, allowing for the integration of p-type FinFETs and n-type GAAFETs with optimized gate structures and spacer formations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional single-patterning fabrication is used, then manufacturing process is simple, but spacing between gate structures and fins is insufficient, limiting device density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespacing between gate structures and finsVSAvoidfabrication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fabrication process is segmented into multiple patterning steps (e.g., self-aligned double-patterning, self-aligned triple-patterning) where each step creates a portion of the final pattern. This segmentation allows achieving finer spacing between gate structures and fins that cannot be obtained with single-patterning, directly resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and process complexity by breaking down the complex task into manageable sequential steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces vertical dimensionality through multi-layered spacer formation and etch-stop layers at different depths. By utilizing the vertical stacking of spacer layers (first spacer, second spacer, third spacer at different positions) and etch-stop layers, the process achieves superior lateral patterning precision without proportionally increasing lateral process complexity, effectively resolving the spacing precision versus process complexity contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If device density is increased through scaling, then functional density improves, but layout restrictions on spacing between gate isolation structures and fins worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional density of ICVSAvoidspacing control between gate structures and fins
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Etch-stop layers are formed preliminarily at specific depths before the final gate patterning step. These pre-positioned etch-stop layers (at different vertical levels) provide precise depth references that guide subsequent etching processes, ensuring that gate structures and fins are spaced correctly even as device density increases through scaling. This preliminary action enables maintaining manufacturing precision despite increased functional density requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple spacer layers act as intermediary structures that mediate between the lithographically defined patterns and the final gate structures. The spacers (first, second, third spacers at different positions) serve as intermediate patterning elements that translate coarse lithographic features into fine-spaced gate-fin structures, enabling increased functional density while maintaining precise spacing control through the intermediary spacer formation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If multi-patterning processes are used to improve spacing, then device density increases, but fabrication complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespacing between gate structures and finsVSAvoidfabrication process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs self-aligned patterning techniques where each patterning step automatically aligns itself to previously formed structures without requiring additional alignment operations. For example, spacers are formed conformally on existing structures and then etched back, with the etch automatically stopping at pre-formed etch-stop layers. This self-service approach enables multi-patterning to achieve superior spacing precision while minimizing the increase in fabrication complexity by eliminating manual alignment steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The fabrication process utilizes parameter changes in the form of selective etching based on depth and material composition. By varying etch selectivity parameters (etch rate, stopping depth, material specificity) across different process steps, the patent achieves precise spacing control through multi-patterning while managing fabrication complexity. The etch-stop layers enable parameter-based control where etching automatically adjusts its depth based on encountering different material layers, simplifying the overall manufacturing process despite multiple patterning steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240421185A1Convergent fin and nanostructure transistor structure and method
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US20240421185A1 patent drawing
  • US20240421185A1 patent drawing
  • US20240421185A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device includes a substrate, a first semiconductor fin over the substrate extending in a first lateral direction, a first vertical stack of semiconductor nanosheets over the substrate extending in the first lateral direction, and an inactive fin between the first semiconductor fin and the first vertical stack extending in the first lateral direction. A first gate structure surrounds and covers the first semiconductor fin, and extends in a second lateral direction substantially perpendicular to the first lateral direction. A second gate structure surrounds and covers the first vertical stack, and extends in the second lateral direction.