Conversation Agent Intent Routing for Data Interpretation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional conversation systems based on rule templates lack flexibility and adaptability, requiring high development costs and long cycles to handle complex and changing real-world application needs, limiting their ability to address new or unexpected user requests.

Innovation Solution

A conversation agent utilizing artificial intelligence and natural language processing to understand user intentions, generate accurate responses, and provide data interpretation and diagnostic services, leveraging generative language models to improve efficiency and adaptability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If rule templates are used for conversation systems, then development costs and cycles are reduced for simple scenarios, but flexibility and adaptability to new or unexpected user requests deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment costVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic conversation system that transitions from static rule templates to adaptive AI models. The system dynamically adjusts its processing approach based on input complexity, switching between rule-based responses for simple queries and generative language models for complex or novel requests, thereby achieving both cost efficiency and adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the conversation handling into multiple levels: rule template matching for straightforward scenarios, intent recognition for semi-structured queries, and generative modeling for complex open-ended requests. This segmentation allows the system to apply appropriate processing power to each scenario type, reducing overall development costs while maintaining high adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If manually written dialogue rules and templates are used, then specific predetermined scenarios are handled accurately, but the system lacks flexibility for complex and changing real-world application needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts its response generation mechanism based on the complexity and novelty of user inputs. For routine queries, it uses pre-defined templates ensuring accuracy; for novel or complex scenarios, it activates intent recognition and generative models that provide flexibility while maintaining contextual accuracy through learned patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary intent recognition layer between rule templates and generative models. This intermediary component analyzes user inputs to determine whether to invoke rule-based responses, template filling, or full generative modeling, thereby seamlessly bridging the gap between precision and flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If generative language models are used, then adaptability to diverse scenarios and user intentions is improved, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidcomputational resource
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments language processing into hierarchical levels: exact rule matching for simple cases, template-based generation for semi-structured responses, and full generative modeling only for complex novel queries. This segmentation ensures generative models are invoked minimally, reducing computational resource consumption while maintaining high adaptability for scenarios that truly require it

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial generative action by using template filling and parameter binding for routine queries rather than full generative modeling. This partial approach provides sufficient adaptability for common scenarios while significantly reducing computational overhead compared to always using complete generative models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Productivity

If AI and natural language processing are used, then conversation efficiency and accuracy are enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the AI system into modular components: intent recognition module, template selection module, parameter extraction module, and response generation module. Each module performs a specific function with well-defined interfaces, reducing overall system complexity while enabling high conversation efficiency through specialized processing in each segment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal template system that serves multiple functions: structured response formatting, parameter binding, and context maintenance. This multi-functional template approach reduces the need for separate specialized components, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining high productivity across diverse conversation scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250315430A1Conversation agent for data interpretation and diagnosis
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 BYTEDANCE TECHNOLOGY LTD
  • US20250315430A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315430A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315430A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A conversation agent is described. An example method includes receiving a user request from a user interface of a conversation agent; determining a predicted intent of the user request; selecting a prompt template from a plurality of prompt templates corresponding to respective intents based on the predicted intent of the user request; generating a prompt using the prompt template and the user request; processing the prompt using a generative language model to generate an output; and displaying, on the user interface, a response to the user request generated based on the output.