Real-Time Conversation Analysis for In-Person Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fraud detection systems are fragmented, reactive, and inadequate in addressing sophisticated vishing and in-person fraud, failing to provide real-time, integrated protection against caller ID spoofing and manipulation in telecommunications and banking environments.

Innovation Solution

An AI-driven system that integrates SIP-based identification, STIR/SHAKEN validation, and real-time speech analysis using the Viterbi algorithm to authenticate callers and analyze conversations, blocking fraudulent calls and transactions proactively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional security systems and caller identification technologies are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but detection precision and reliability are insufficient against sophisticated vishing attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud detection system is divided into multiple specialized modules: SIP data analysis module, speech analysis module (using Viterbi algorithm), anomaly pattern detection module, and risk scoring module. Each module handles a specific aspect of fraud detection, allowing the system to achieve high detection precision through specialized processing while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs comprehensive analysis beyond traditional caller ID verification by incorporating speech pattern analysis, SIP data examination, and real-time anomaly detection. This excessive action in terms of analysis depth ensures high detection precision by examining multiple dimensions of potential fraud indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Loss of time

If reactive fraud detection systems are used, then system complexity is reduced, but loss of time and productivity are increased due to delayed fraud prevention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary fraud detection by analyzing SIP data and speech patterns during the call setup phase and in real-time during the conversation, before fraud can be completed. This allows the system to prevent fraud proactively rather than reacting after damage occurs, significantly reducing response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors call data and speech patterns, providing real-time feedback on fraud risk levels. This feedback mechanism enables dynamic adjustment of detection thresholds and immediate fraud prevention actions, reducing the time lag between fraud detection and prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If fragmented security systems are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability and detection precision are insufficient due to lack of integration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity reliabilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple previously separate security functions into a unified fraud detection platform that simultaneously analyzes SIP data, speech patterns, and anomaly indicators. This integration improves reliability by providing comprehensive fraud detection through coordinated analysis of multiple data sources rather than isolated security checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified fraud detection system serves multiple functions: caller authentication, speech analysis, anomaly detection, risk scoring, and fraud prevention. This multi-functionality improves security reliability by addressing various fraud vectors through a single integrated system rather than requiring multiple separate security solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive real-time analysis of SIP data and speech patterns is performed, then detection precision is improved, but use of energy and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs comprehensive speech and SIP data analysis only when fraud risk indicators are detected during call setup or conversation, rather than analyzing every call uniformly. This selective application of intensive analysis maintains high detection precision for suspicious calls while reducing unnecessary computational energy consumption for legitimate calls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260010907A1Real-Time AI-Driven Fraud Detection and Prevention System for In-Person Transactions
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US20260010907A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010907A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010907A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and processes are disclosed for real-time fraud detection and prevention in in-person transactions. The invention utilizes an AI/ML engine to analyze customer application data for inconsistencies and unusual requests indicative of potential fraud. Concurrently, a real-time conversation analysis engine with speech recognition algorithms monitors interactions between bank associates and customers, identifying suspicious speech patterns, hesitations, and keywords associated with scams. By combining insights from application data and conversational analysis, the system generates a comprehensive risk assessment. When a high probability of fraud is detected, an alert notifies the bank associate, security personnel, and other relevant individuals. This proactive approach enables immediate action to prevent fraudulent transactions, reducing manipulation risks and minimizing financial losses. The system continuously learns from new data, adapting to evolving fraud tactics, thus providing robust, long-term protection for financial institutions and their customers.