Conversational Intent Clustering for Accurate Real-Time Responses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to generate timely and pertinent conversational responses due to the sparseness of training data and individual user particularities, making it difficult to determine specific user intents accurately.

Innovation Solution

The system employs multiple machine learning models for unsupervised hierarchical clustering of intents into clusters, using models like BERT and ELMo for natural language processing, and selects a subset of intent clusters based on feature inputs to provide dynamic conversational responses, relying on user selection within clusters to reduce false positives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the system uses machine learning models to determine specific user intents, then the accuracy of intent determination improves, but the complexity of the system increases due to multiple models and clustering mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintent determination accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the intent determination process into multiple stages: first clustering intents into groups using unsupervised hierarchical clustering, then selecting representative intents from each cluster. This segmentation allows the system to handle complexity by breaking down the intent determination task into manageable steps, improving accuracy while managing system complexity through structured decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intent clusters as intermediary structures between raw user inputs and final intent determinations. These clusters act as mediators that group similar intents together, allowing the system to work with simplified cluster representations rather than directly handling the full complexity of individual intent classifications, thus reducing effective system complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system aggregates detailed information about user actions and circumstances, then the precision of intent determination improves, but the amount of data processing and computational resources required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintent determination precisionVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and selects only the most relevant features from the aggregated user action and circumstance data to use in intent clustering. By identifying and extracting key discriminative features rather than processing all available data, the system achieves high precision intent determination while reducing computational resource consumption through feature selection and dimensionality reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by processing only the necessary subset of aggregated information required for effective intent clustering. Rather than exhaustively analyzing all user action details and circumstances, the system selectively processes partial information that is sufficient for accurate intent determination, thereby reducing computational overhead while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the system provides multiple conversational response options, then the relevance and user satisfaction improve, but the time required to process and present responses increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversational response relevanceVSAvoidresponse generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary clustering of intents into groups before generating conversational responses. This pre-processing organizes potential responses in advance, allowing the system to quickly retrieve and present relevant response options without time-consuming real-time analysis during user interaction, thus improving response relevance while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic response selection where the system adapts the number and type of response options based on contextual factors. The system dynamically adjusts conversational response strategies based on user profile, conversation history, and situation, presenting more detailed options when appropriate and simpler options when time is constrained, thereby balancing relevance with response generation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250358248A1Systems and methods for generating conversational responses using machine learning models
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20250358248A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358248A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358248A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are described for generating dynamic conversational responses using two-tier machine learning models. The dynamic conversational responses may be generated in real time and reflect the likely goals and/or intents of a user. The two-tier machine learning model may include a first tier that determines an intent cluster based on a feature input, and a second tier that determines a specific intent from the cluster.