Conversational Recommendation Planning for Fewer User Queries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing conversational recommendation systems, such as LLM-based chatbots, are inefficient in determining user intent and require multiple queries to provide satisfactory responses, leading to high computing resource consumption due to limited memory and processing capacity.

Innovation Solution

A conversational recommendation system trained using triplets that include user queries, model reasoning plans, and responses, allowing for multi-stage recommendation processes with planning, conversation, and retrieval stages to accurately determine user intent and reduce query requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If LLM-based chatbots are used for conversational recommendations, then natural language processing capability is improved, but computing resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenatural language processing capabilityVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the recommendation task into multiple stages: intent recognition, recommendation generation, and feedback processing. Each stage is handled by specialized components rather than a monolithic LLM, reducing overall computational requirements while maintaining natural language processing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing user queries to extract key features and intents before passing them to the recommendation engine. This preliminary processing reduces the complexity of subsequent LLM operations and minimizes computing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Power

If LLM-based systems are deployed at scale, then processing capacity is improved, but efficiency deteriorates due to multiple queries required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidefficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system learns from user interactions and refines its understanding of user intent over time. This feedback loop enables the system to accurately determine user intent in fewer queries, improving efficiency while maintaining high processing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts parameters such as context window size, model temperature, and processing depth based on query complexity and user behavior patterns. This adaptive parameter adjustment optimizes the balance between processing capacity utilization and query efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If multiple queries are required to fulfill user intent, then conversation understanding is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversation understandingVSAvoidnumber of queries required
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary intent recognition and context extraction from the first query, forming an initial understanding that guides subsequent interactions. This preliminary action reduces the number of queries needed while preserving conversation understanding through structured context management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous context tracking across conversation turns, preserving useful information from previous queries without requiring users to repeat themselves. This continuity enables accurate intent determination in fewer interactions while preventing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250356223A1Machine-Learning Systems and Methods for Conversational Recommendations
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20250356223A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356223A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356223A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosed technology include computer-implemented systems and methods for conversational recommendation systems, such as conversational chatbots that are configured to process user queries and generate responses. A recommendation system includes a conversational user interface configured to receive a user query and provide a recommendation response and a machine-learned sequence processing model that has been trained on training data including a plurality of triplets. Each triplet includes an example query, an example model reasoning plan associated with the example query, and an example response associated with the example query and the example model reasoning plan. The sequence processing model can be trained to provide conversational-based recommendations using a multi-stage recommendation process that includes a planning stage, a conversation stage, and a retrieval stage.