Multistage Converter Body Brake Timing for Output Spike Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multistage buck converters face challenges in high-power applications due to output voltage spikes when load current suddenly drops, as traditional body brake conditions become inefficient in returning the output voltage to its target level.

Innovation Solution

A method and controller for determining a target body brake time period to set the load current below a threshold, activating a body brake condition, turning off each stage, and deactivating it after the target time period to manage output voltage spikes, using a body brake controller and switch driver to generate driving signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a body brake condition is activated to reduce output voltage spikes, then voltage ripple is reduced, but the system becomes less efficient in returning the output voltage to its target level when maintained too long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput voltage spikesVSAvoidefficiency in returning voltage to target level
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The body brake condition duration is made dynamic rather than fixed. The controller determines an optimal body brake time period based on real-time system state, allowing the brake condition to be deactivated at the most efficient moment. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by adapting the brake duration to actual voltage recovery needs, preventing both excessive voltage spikes and unnecessary energy loss from prolonged braking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback control to monitor the output voltage and determine when to deactivate the body brake condition. The controller continuously assesses whether the load current has dropped below the threshold and whether the output voltage is recovering, using this feedback to optimize the brake duration. This feedback mechanism ensures the brake condition is maintained long enough to suppress voltage spikes but deactivated promptly to restore efficient voltage regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the body brake condition is activated for a longer duration, then output voltage spikes are better suppressed, but the time to return to normal operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput voltage spikesVSAvoidtime to return to target voltage level
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The body brake time period is determined dynamically based on the actual voltage spike severity and system recovery rate. Rather than using a fixed or excessively long brake duration, the controller calculates the optimal time needed to suppress the voltage spike and then deactivates the brake condition. This dynamic timing minimizes the loss of time while still effectively suppressing voltage spikes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own state information (output voltage level, load current changes) to automatically determine the appropriate brake duration without external intervention. The controller self-regulates the body brake condition by monitoring when the voltage spike is sufficiently suppressed and when normal operation can resume, optimizing the balance between spike suppression and rapid return to service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If all stages are turned off during body brake condition, then voltage spike suppression is maximized, but the system loses power conversion capability during this period

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput voltage spikesVSAvoidpower conversion capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The body brake condition is activated in advance of severe voltage spikes to prevent them from occurring. By turning off all stages proactively when a load current drop is detected, the system prevents voltage spikes before they can develop. This preliminary action maximizes spike suppression while limiting the power conversion interruption to only what is necessary to prevent the harmful voltage event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The body brake condition is applied periodically or intermittently rather than continuously, only when load current drops indicate a potential voltage spike event. The controller activates the brake condition temporarily to suppress spikes, then deactivates it to restore power conversion capability. This periodic application balances spike suppression with maintaining overall system power delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12149175B2Body brake control for multistage power converter
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 SEMICON COMPONENTS IND LLC
  • US12149175B2 patent drawing
  • US12149175B2 patent drawing
  • US12149175B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems for power conversion, and controllers and methods for operating a multiage power converter. The method includes determining a target body brake time period for setting a load current of the multistage power converter below a predetermined threshold. The method also includes activating a body brake condition for the multistage power converter. The method further includes turning off each stage in the multistage power converter when the body brake condition is active. The method also includes deactivating the body brake condition after the target body brake time period following an activation of the body brake condition.