Power Converter Common Mode Voltage Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current power conversion systems, particularly current source converters, face challenges in controlling common mode voltages and currents, leading to increased saturation levels in link chokes, which results in higher costs, size, and weight due to the use of space vector modulation (SVM) techniques.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of zero vector selection methods in space vector modulation (SVM) to counteract active vector common mode contributions, reducing the saturation level of SVM and optimizing the design of common mode chokes by selecting zero vectors based on computed or measured common mode contributions, and considering the operational status of the inverter as motoring or regenerating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If space vector modulation (SVM) is used for power conversion control, then the ease of operation and control simplicity is improved, but the common mode voltage and current increase causing link choke saturation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidcommon mode voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the modulation parameters by selecting specific zero vectors (U7, U8, or U9) based on the sector position and operational mode (motoring or regenerating). This parameter selection modifies the common mode voltage characteristics while maintaining SVM control simplicity, thereby reducing link choke saturation without sacrificing ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If common mode voltage control is implemented in current source converters, then the harmful effects on motors are reduced, but the device complexity increases due to additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor damageVSAvoidsystem components
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by using the existing SVM control structure and leveraging the natural properties of zero vectors to reduce common mode voltage. The control system selectively applies zero vectors based on sector and operational mode without requiring external isolation transformers or common mode filter circuits, thereby protecting motors while avoiding additional complex components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Weight of stationary object

If zero vector selection is implemented to counteract common mode contributions, then the saturation level of link choke is reduced, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelink choke sizeVSAvoidzero vector selection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-determining the appropriate zero vector selection strategy based on the sector position and operational mode (motoring or regenerating). This pre-planned approach simplifies the control logic and reduces the precision requirements during real-time operation, as the zero vector selection follows predetermined rules rather than requiring complex real-time calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9362839B2Power converter with common mode voltage reduction
Publication Date: 2016.06.07 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US9362839B2 patent drawing
  • US9362839B2 patent drawing
  • US9362839B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Power conversion systems are presented with common mode reduction by space vector pulse width modulation zero vector selection to counteract common mode contribution of active vectors.