Switching Power Converter Duty Cycle Control via Ramp Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional power converter control circuits face high computing stress and engineering resource strain due to complex algorithms and sensing techniques required for stringent load profiles, particularly in ensuring clean and error-free power delivery under changing load conditions.

Innovation Solution

A switching power converter with a control circuit that generates two ramp signals based on complementary clock signals, allowing for the generation of control signals for power switching devices without relying on error signals, thereby simplifying the control scheme and reducing computing stress by using these ramp signals and sensed output voltage to regulate the power converter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional control circuits use complex algorithms and sensing techniques for stringent load profiles, then output regulation precision is improved, but computing stress and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput regulation precisionVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit is segmented into multiple independent comparators, each handling specific switching devices. Each comparator independently compares its ramp signal with the feedback signal to generate control signals, dividing the complex control function into simpler parallel operations that reduce overall computational burden while maintaining precise output regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Ramp signals are generated periodically using clock signals to create time-based control waveforms. These periodic ramp signals enable pulse-width modulation (PWM) control where the duty cycle is automatically adjusted based on the comparison between ramp and feedback signals, providing precise output regulation through periodic switching action without requiring complex continuous computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If complex algorithms are used to ensure clean power delivery under changing load conditions, then power quality is improved, but computing stress on microcontrollers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery qualityVSAvoidcomputing stress
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit uses self-service through automatic voltage regulation where the comparators continuously compare the feedback signal with ramp signals and automatically adjust the duty cycle of control signals. This self-regulating mechanism ensures clean power delivery under changing load conditions without requiring external microcontroller intervention or complex computational algorithms, thereby reducing computing stress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A feedback signal representing the output voltage is continuously fed back to the comparators. The comparators use this feedback signal to automatically adjust the control signals to the switching devices, maintaining stable output voltage under varying load conditions. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures power delivery quality while avoiding the need for complex computational control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple comparators generate control signals independently, then adaptability to changing operating conditions is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to load changesVSAvoidnumber of comparators
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each comparator is designed as a universal control unit that can independently generate PWM control signals for its assigned switching device. The comparators use the same basic operation (comparing ramp signal with feedback signal) but operate in parallel to control multiple switching devices simultaneously. This multi-functional approach provides adaptability to changing load conditions while keeping each individual comparator simple in structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11411556B2Duty cycle control for switching power converters
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 AES GLOBAL HLDG PTE LTD
  • US11411556B2 patent drawing
  • US11411556B2 patent drawing
  • US11411556B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A switching power converter includes a power circuit including at least two power switching devices and a control circuit coupled to the power circuit for controlling the power switching devices. The control circuit is configured to sense an output voltage of the power circuit, generate at least two ramp signals based on complementary clock signals, and generate a control signal for controlling one of the power switching devices based on one of the ramp signals and the output voltage of the power circuit, and another control signal for controlling another one of the power switching devices based on another one of the ramp signals and the output voltage of the power circuit. In some examples, the control circuit may include comparators for generating the control signals. Other example power converters and control circuits are also disclosed.