Convertible Mat Border Structure for Flat-to-Tray Transport

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mats and pads are limited to single functions, such as protection or receiving items, and lack versatility in use, particularly in transitioning between configurations for easier loading and transport.

Innovation Solution

A convertible mat that can switch between a planar and tray configuration, featuring a border that is either integral or separable, with handles and reversible design, allowing for bistable operation and adaptable material selection for specific properties, enabling dual-purpose use in transporting and placing items.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a mat is designed for single function (protection or receiving items), then it is simple in structure, but it lacks versatility in use

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveversatilityVSAvoidstructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mat incorporates a border that can dynamically change its configuration between flat and raised states. This dynamic structure allows the same mat to serve multiple functions: when flat, it provides a large surface area for protection and item placement; when raised, it creates a tray-like structure for transport and containment. The dynamic transformation resolves the contradiction by enabling versatility without requiring multiple separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mat is designed with universal functionality to perform multiple tasks: it can protect surfaces, receive and hold items, transport objects, and provide structural support. The border's ability to transform between configurations enables the mat to adapt to different use cases, making a single device serve multiple purposes and thereby increasing versatility without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If a mat is designed with fixed planar configuration, then it is easy to manufacture, but it cannot facilitate easier loading and transport

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading and transportVSAvoidmanufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The border is designed with fold lines that enable it to transform from a flat configuration during manufacturing to a raised tray-like configuration during use. This dynamic capability allows the mat to be easily manufactured in a simple flat state while still providing the functionality to facilitate loading and transport when needed, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing ease and operational convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The border is segmented into sections connected by fold lines, allowing it to be manufactured in a flat, easy-to-produce state while enabling transformation into a three-dimensional tray structure for loading and transport. The segmentation allows the border to be manufactured simply but still achieve the desired operational functionality through controlled folding and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the border is made integral with the base, then the structure is simpler, but the mat cannot be reversed for different uses

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereversibilityVSAvoidstructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The border is designed with dynamic connectivity to the base, allowing it to be integral yet movable. This enables the mat to be reversed and the border to adapt to different orientations, providing versatility for different uses while maintaining a relatively simple integrated structure that does not require separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Stability of the object's composition

If the mat is made bistable, then it can hold itself in mat and tray positions, but it requires additional structural features

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidstructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mat incorporates bistable mechanics into its border structure, allowing it to naturally settle into and hold two stable configurations: the flat mat position and the raised tray position. This dynamic stability feature enables the mat to maintain its configuration without external support while providing the versatility of multiple usable states, resolving the contradiction between stability and structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2654516B1A convertible mat
Publication Date: 2018.05.30 TRADESTOCK
  • EP2654516B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2654516B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2654516B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A convertible mat (10) is provided and comprises a generally planar base (20) and a border extending around the base, the border comprising border sections (25, 26, 27, 28) joined together by webs, the webs being single, substantially non-folding web sections (35, 36, 37, 38) which cause the border sections to be movable together between a first position in which they are coplanar with the base and a second position in which they are inclined whereby to form a tray.