Convex Cyclone Body Shape for Lower Vacuum Cleaner Pressure Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cyclone dust-separating apparatuses in vacuum cleaners face issues with increased operating noise and pressure loss due to uniform cylinder shape, leading to higher power consumption and frequent emptying of dust collections.

Innovation Solution

The cyclone dust-separating apparatus features a cyclone body with a convex cylinder shape, where the diameter is maximized at the air discharging part, and can be formed by joining convex and linear cylinder portions, with various inlet shapes to reduce airflow speed and pressure loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the cyclone body is formed in a uniform cylinder shape, then the manufacturing is simple, but the air flowing speed increases at the air discharging part causing increased pressure loss and operating noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecyclone body manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The cyclone body is designed with non-uniform diameter along its longitudinal axis, where the diameter varies to control airflow characteristics. Specifically, the diameter is smaller near the air discharging part to reduce airflow speed and pressure loss, while maintaining sufficient diameter in other sections for effective dust separation. This local variation in geometric property resolves the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameter (diameter) of the cyclone body along its length to optimize performance. By making the diameter variable rather than constant, the airflow speed at the discharging part is controlled, reducing pressure loss and operating noise while maintaining dust separation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If the cyclone body is formed in a uniform cylinder shape, then the manufacturing is simple, but the operating noise increases due to increased airflow speed at discharge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecyclone body manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidoperating noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cyclone body employs local quality variation by having different diameters at different sections. The diameter is specifically reduced near the air discharging part to lower airflow velocity, which directly reduces turbulence and operating noise, while maintaining adequate diameter elsewhere for proper cyclone function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the diameter parameter along the longitudinal axis of the cyclone body, the patent controls the airflow characteristics to minimize noise generation. The variable diameter design reduces sudden expansions and contractions that cause turbulence and noise, achieving quieter operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If the cyclone body is formed in a uniform cylinder shape, then the manufacturing is simple, but the suction motor output must be increased to compensate for pressure loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecyclone body manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidsuction motor output
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The non-uniform diameter design with smaller diameter near the discharge part creates a more efficient airflow path that reduces pressure loss. This allows the suction motor to operate at lower power output while maintaining the same dust separation performance, reducing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By optimizing the diameter parameter distribution along the cyclone body, the patent reduces overall pressure loss in the system. This parameter optimization enables the suction motor to deliver the required performance with lower power consumption, improving overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces operating noise and pressure loss, decreasing the suction motor output required for the same dust-separating efficiency, allowing for more efficient and less power-intensive operation.

Implementation Method 1

a cyclone having a cyclone body, which rotates air to separate dust or dirt therefrom

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclone separation: Cyclone Separation

Implementation Method 2

a cyclone having a cyclone body, which rotates air to separate dust or dirt therefrom

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS7776116B2Cyclone dust-separating apparatus of vacuum cleaner
Publication Date: 2010.08.17 SAMSUNG GWANGJU ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US7776116B2 patent drawing
  • US7776116B2 patent drawing
  • US7776116B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cyclone dust-separating apparatus of a vacuum cleaner is disclosed. The cyclone dust-separating apparatus includes at least one cyclone having a cyclone body, which rotates air to separate dust or dirt therefrom, which has an air inflow part and an air discharging part, and which is installed in such a manner that a longitudinal axis thereof is substantially horizontally arranged, and a dust collecting unit to store the dust or dirt separated by the cyclone unit. The cyclone body is formed in a convex cylinder shape, so that a diameter thereof in the vicinity of an entrance of the air discharging part through which the air is discharged comes maximum.