Conveyance Request Matching for Real-Time Preference-Based Dispatch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing conveyance industry systems lack the capability to analyze and secure conveyance service requests in substantially real time, leading to inefficiencies for both representatives and clients, and do not allow representatives to apply their preferences effectively, resulting in suboptimal service requests and reduced earning potential.

Innovation Solution

An interactive network and method that utilizes a Representative Automated Platform (RAP) and Autonomous Vehicle Automated Platform (AVAP) to continuously analyze and secure preferred conveyance service requests in real time based on representative or AV preferences, optimizing vehicle utilization and decision-making processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If representatives manually evaluate conveyance service requests in real time, then they can make informed decisions based on preferences, but the system complexity and time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverepresentative decision-makingVSAvoidsystem complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores optimal conveyance service requests based on representative preferences before requests are made. When a request comes in, the system has already prepared matching recommendations, eliminating the need for complex real-time analysis by representatives.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically evaluates incoming conveyance service requests against stored representative preferences and generates recommendations without requiring representative intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously matching requests to preferences and presenting optimized options.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system presents only one conveyance service request at a time, then the interface remains simple, but representatives cannot compare options and make optimal decisions

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverepresentative choiceVSAvoidinterface complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments conveyance service requests into distinct, comparable options based on representative preferences. Each request is presented as a separate, evaluated candidate with clear differentiation, allowing representatives to compare discrete options without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the presentation parameters of conveyance service requests by sorting and filtering them according to representative preferences. Requests are transformed from raw data into preference-aligned options with varying degrees of match quality, enabling comparative decision-making.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If representatives work across multiple conveyance industry segments simultaneously, then earning potential increases, but the ability to rapidly evaluate and secure requests decreases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverepresentative earning potentialVSAvoidrequest evaluation time

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal preference profile for each representative that works across multiple conveyance industry segments. The same preference framework evaluates requests whether they are for ride-hail, rideshare, on-demand delivery, or other segments, eliminating the need for separate evaluation processes for each segment.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous evaluation of conveyance service requests across all industry segments simultaneously. As requests arrive in real-time from any segment, the system continuously matches them against stored preferences and presents recommendations without interruption, allowing representatives to maintain steady productivity across segments.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If conveyance service requests are secured without real-time analysis, then the process is fast, but representatives receive suboptimal requests that do not match their preferences

Engineering Contradiction:

Improverequest processing speedVSAvoidrequest quality

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-evaluates incoming conveyance service requests against representative preferences before presenting them. This preliminary filtering ensures that only preference-matching requests are considered, guaranteeing quality without sacrificing speed since the evaluation work is done automatically in advance.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to representatives about how well each conveyance service request matches their stored preferences. This feedback mechanism ensures representatives receive high-quality, preference-aligned requests while maintaining fast processing through automated matching algorithms.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12555050B2Interactive network and method for securing conveyance services

Publication Date: 2026.02.17 TELEPORT MOBILITY INC

AI summary

The inventive platform and method address a long felt need for optimizing the efficiency of operation within the conveyance industry for goods and services by providing for the filtering, selection and securing of conveyance services in accordance with one or more of client and representative preferences in substantially real time. An efficiency preference may be employed to pool conveyance services for optimizing vehicle utilization.