Conveying Device Axial Outlet Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing conveying devices in vehicles, such as water pumps and compressors, require complex valve systems for fluid flow distribution, leading to high component costs and limited adjustability of fluid flows.

Innovation Solution

A conveying device with a rotatable ring element and axially spaced outlet openings, allowing independent division of fluid volume flow and finer adjustment through a parting plate, enabling better control of fluid flow without inhibiting the flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If valve systems are used for fluid flow distribution, then fluid flow control is achieved, but component costs increase and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow controlVSAvoidvalve system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the flow control function from complex valve systems and implements it through a simplified mechanism consisting of a rotatable ring element with adjustable orifices and a parting plate. This removes the need for separate valve components while maintaining flow control capability, directly resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotatable ring element serves multiple functions: it acts as both a flow distribution mechanism and an adjustment mechanism, while the parting plate provides additional flow division capability. This multi-functionality consolidates what would traditionally require multiple separate valve components into a single integrated structure, reducing device complexity while maintaining operational control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If valve systems are used for fluid flow distribution, then fluid flow control is achieved, but component costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow controlVSAvoidcomponent costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the flow control function and flow distribution function into a single integrated ring element structure, eliminating the need for separate valve bodies, actuators, and mounting hardware. This consolidation reduces the total number of components that need to be manufactured and assembled, directly lowering component costs while maintaining full fluid flow control capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The ring element with its rotatable design and adjustable orifices provides universal flow control capability for multiple outlet openings, replacing what would traditionally require multiple specialized valve components. This multi-functional design reduces the overall bill of materials and manufacturing complexity, addressing the cost issue directly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If a single outlet opening is used, then device structure is simple, but fluid flow adjustability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutlet opening structureVSAvoidfluid flow adjustability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the single outlet opening into multiple outlet openings (first and second outlet openings) that are axially spaced apart. The parting plate further segments the fluid flow into separate partial flows for each outlet. This segmentation allows independent control and adjustment of flow to different outlets, dramatically increasing adaptability while the overall structure remains relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces axial spacing between outlet openings as a new dimension for flow distribution. By spacing outlets axially rather than just radially, the design enables independent flow control in the axial direction, adding versatility to the structure without significantly increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Volume of moving object

If outlet openings are positioned close to each other, then device structure is compact, but independent flow division is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice volumeVSAvoidindependent flow division
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions outlet openings in the axial dimension rather than only in the radial plane. This axial separation allows the parting plate to effectively divide flows between outlets without requiring large radial spacing, maintaining compact device volume while enabling independent flow division through the axial positioning strategy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11525458B2Conveying device
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 HANON SYST EFP DEUT GMBH
  • US11525458B2 patent drawing
  • US11525458B2 patent drawing
  • US11525458B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A conveying device with an electric drive, having a housing with a suction opening and a plurality of outlet openings that comprises a conveying element which is rotatably received in the housing to produce a fluid flow from the suction opening to the respective outlet opening, wherein the outlet openings are mounted to the housing at least axially spaced from each other.