Conveyor Drum Support Elements for Combine Harvester

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing combine harvester designs suffer from damage to the conveyor drum due to dynamically changing loads during crop conveyance, leading to cracks in weld seams and potential detachment of support elements, which compromises crop flow and damages downstream components.

Innovation Solution

The support elements extend radially over the entire lateral surface of the conveyor drum between guide plates, absorbing forces tangentially and reducing the risk of damage by distributing them in the circumferential direction, thereby avoiding acute angle stress and material wastage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If support elements are connected to guide plates by welded joints, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but cracks appear in the weld seams or support elements due to dynamically changing loads during crop conveyance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The support element is divided into two functional parts: a first end that connects to the guide plate and a second end that contacts the lateral surface. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized independently - the connection end for manufacturing ease and the support end for load distribution and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support element extends in the radial direction from the guide plate to the lateral surface, adding a radial dimension to the force transmission path. This radial extension distributes forces over a larger area of the lateral surface, preventing stress concentration at the weld seam while maintaining simple welded connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If the radial extent of support elements is increased to improve force distribution, then force absorption is improved, but the weight and material costs of the conveyor drum increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The support element provides localized reinforcement only where needed - extending radially from the guide plate to the lateral surface at specific circumferential positions. This local quality approach strengthens the force transmission path without requiring increased thickness of the entire conveyor drum, thus avoiding unnecessary weight and material costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The support element acts as a composite structural component that combines the guide plate and lateral surface into a integrated force-bearing structure. This composite approach distributes forces through the support element rather than requiring the lateral surface alone to bear all loads, achieving strength without increasing overall material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Shape

If support elements have a wedge-shaped geometry with acute angle at the free end, then the structure is compact, but forces are introduced at an acute angle causing cracks and damage

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveshapeVSAvoidharmful factors
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of having the support element taper to an acute angle at the free end (prior art), the invention inverts this geometry by having the support element extend radially with its full width at the free end that contacts the lateral surface. This inversion changes the force introduction angle from acute to essentially perpendicular, eliminating stress concentration and crack formation while maintaining compact geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Strength

If the jacket thickness of the base body of the conveyor drum is increased to prevent damage, then strength and damage resistance are improved, but the weight and material costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidmaterial costs
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The strength enhancement is segmented into discrete support elements positioned at specific locations where forces are applied, rather than uniformly increasing the jacket thickness throughout. This segmentation achieves the necessary strength at critical locations while minimizing overall material usage and costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support elements provide localized strength enhancement only at the positions where guide plates transmit forces to the lateral surface. This local quality approach avoids the unnecessary material cost and weight increase that would result from uniformly thickening the entire conveyor drum jacket.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2681986B1Combine harvester
Publication Date: 2017.08.16 CLAAS SELBSTFAHRENDE ERNTEMASCHINEN GMBH
  • EP2681986B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2681986B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2681986B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The harvester i.e. self-propelled combine harvester (1), has an axial separating device (3) i.e. tray-type shaker, extending along longitudinal direction of the harvester. A tangentially arranged feed drum (8) is installed in front of the device and configured with axially parallel guide plates on the circumference of the drum. The plates bear against a free jacket surface of the drum through support elements that extend between adjacent guide plates along circumferential direction. The support elements extend between the adjacent guide plates along radial direction over the jacket surface.