Conveyor Flow Device Control With Decentralized Local Controllers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conveyor systems for automated production face challenges in setup, maintenance, and cost due to the need for extensive programming and rebalancing, particularly when changing manufacturing configurations or dealing with wear and stoppages, which require significant labor and reprogramming.

Innovation Solution

A conveyor system with local controllers that can autonomously process sensor data, generate command data, and communicate with central controllers, reducing the load on central controllers and allowing for real-time decision-making, thereby facilitating easier design, assembly, and maintenance, and potentially reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a central controller is used to control all functions in the conveyor system, then centralized control and coordination are achieved, but the amount of wiring and programming required increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized controlVSAvoidwiring and programming
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into a central controller and multiple local controllers. Each local controller is assigned to specific flow devices (stop devices, switch devices, merge devices) and handles local control functions independently. This segmentation reduces the wiring burden on the central controller and distributes the programming complexity across multiple simpler local controllers that communicate with the central controller through standardized data interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If extensive programming is used to handle each sensor and actuator in the central controller, then complete system control is achieved, but the cost and time for setup and maintenance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem controlVSAvoidsetup and maintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Local controllers are equipped with autonomous capabilities to handle specific control functions without requiring constant central controller intervention. For example, local controllers can process sensor data from their associated flow devices and execute control commands locally, reducing the programming burden on the central controller and enabling faster setup and maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If the conveyor system is centrally controlled with all functions managed by the central controller, then system coordination is improved, but the cost for designing and configuring the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem coordinationVSAvoiddesign and configuration cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The control architecture is divided into hierarchical levels: a central controller for high-level coordination and local controllers for device-specific control. This segmentation allows the system to maintain coordination through standardized communication protocols while reducing design and configuration costs by distributing control logic to simpler, more specialized local controllers that can be independently configured and replaced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of information

If all control functions are centralized, then system-wide monitoring is achieved, but the robustness of the system decreases due to the single point of failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem-wide monitoringVSAvoidrobustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into independent local controllers that can operate autonomously even when disconnected from the central controller. Each local controller maintains local monitoring and control capabilities, ensuring that failures in the central controller do not completely halt system operations. The central controller continues to provide system-wide monitoring through standardized data interfaces, achieving both robustness and comprehensive monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10908596B2Conveyor system method of operating a conveyor system and flow devices for use in such conveyor system
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 EWAB ENG AB
  • US10908596B2 patent drawing
  • US10908596B2 patent drawing
  • US10908596B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present document discloses a conveyor system comprising a plurality of workpiece carriers, each adapted for supporting at least one workpiece during transportation, a conveyor, adapted for transporting the workpiece carriers, at least one flow device for controlling a movement of one of the workpiece carriers relative to the conveyor, the flow device comprising a local controller, at least one workpiece carrier sensor and at least one actuator, and a central controller, which is in data communication with the flow device, and having a memory containing a flow plan comprising data describing an intended flow of workpieces in the conveyor system.