Conveyor Safety Control via Sensor Pattern Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional conveyor safety systems rely on dedicated sensors for single safety functions, which limits adaptability and does not ensure safety integrity when changes occur, and they do not effectively monitor the overall safety of complex conveyor systems.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based safety control method that learns sensor patterns and logic relationships during operation, allowing for continuous monitoring of safety integrity by comparing sensor outputs with pre-stored reference patterns and logic, enabling adaptive safety responses even without absolute sensor failure indications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If dedicated sensors are used for single safety functions, then safety monitoring is simple and reliable, but adaptability to changes and overall safety integrity of complex conveyors cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changesVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by enabling a single sensor to serve multiple safety functions simultaneously. Instead of dedicating one sensor to one function, the system allows sensors to monitor multiple parameters and contribute to overall safety integrity assessment, thereby improving adaptability without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple sensor signals and safety function evaluations into a unified safety integrity assessment performed by the computer system. By combining sensor outputs and evaluating them against stored logic and reference patterns, the system achieves comprehensive safety monitoring without requiring separate dedicated sensors for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If conventional safety chains with series-connected switches are used, then safety response is immediate and simple, but the system cannot monitor overall safety integrity or adapt to changes in complex conveyor systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety integrityVSAvoidcomputer-based monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/electrical safety chain approach with a computer-based monitoring system. Instead of relying on series-connected switches that provide only binary safety responses, the system uses a computer to evaluate sensor patterns against stored logic and reference patterns, enabling comprehensive safety integrity assessment that adapts to complex conveyor configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring sensor outputs, comparing them against reference patterns stored in the computer system, and evaluating safety integrity based on this comparison. The system learns during operation and uses this feedback to maintain high safety integrity while adapting to changes in the conveyor system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If absolute sensor failure indications are required for safety actions, then false safety stops are reduced, but safety responses cannot be triggered when overall system integrity is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational continuityVSAvoidsafety response capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by triggering safety responses based on partial degradation of safety integrity rather than requiring complete sensor failure. The system evaluates the overall pattern of sensor outputs and can initiate safety actions when the collective signal pattern deviates from reference patterns, even if individual sensors are still functioning, thereby maintaining safety responsiveness while avoiding false stops

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP2421787B1Conveyor safety control
Publication Date: 2013.07.03 OTIS ELEVATOR CO
  • EP2421787B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2421787B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2421787B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A conveyor system has a plurality of sensors coupled to a computer system, the computer system being programmed to check a number of safety functions greater than the number of sensors. A method of controlling the safety function of the conveyor comprises providing signals from a plurality of sensors disposed in relation to the conveyor to a computer system; operating the conveyor in a learn mode; during operation in the learn mode determining in the computer system the relationship between the sensor output signals and pre-stored logic in the computer system which describes the physical geometry of the possible conveyor types and permissible operating characteristics thereof and determining the relationship between the sensor output signals to establish the safety integrity of the sensors, and storing sensor signal patterns as a reference pattern; and subsequently operating the conveyor in a run mode in which safety functions are monitored; and during the run mode comparing in the computer system the pattern of sensor signals with the reference pattern and with the pre-stored logic so as to establish the safety integrity of the sensors, of the computer system and of the operation of the conveyor.