Conveyor Belt With Segmented Compartments For Pet Food Dispensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automatic pet feeders are prone to jamming due to moist pet food and lack remote control and programming capabilities, leading to inconsistent food dispensing and accessibility issues.

Innovation Solution

An animal feeding system featuring a conveyor belt with angled compartments, a drive motor, and a processor that allows for wireless control and programming, enabling portion control, slow-feeding, free-choice, timed, and selective access feeding methods, while preventing pets from reaching the food.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If gravity-based dispensing is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision and consistent food dispensing deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidfood dispensing consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the simple gravity-based mechanical dispensing system with a motorized auger mechanism controlled by a processor. This allows precise control over food dispensing quantities and timing, resolving the contradiction between device simplicity and dispensing consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables adjustable dispensing parameters including portion size, feeding frequency, and timing through programmable controls. This allows the device to maintain consistent dispensing while adapting to different feeding requirements, overcoming the limitations of fixed gravity-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If motorized auger feeding is used, then food dispensing consistency is improved, but device complexity and jamming risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood dispensing consistencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The auger mechanism is designed with segmented compartments that divide food into discrete portions. This segmentation prevents food from clumping and reduces jamming while maintaining consistent dispensing quantities. The conveyor belt also uses divided sections to transport food systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automatic food level sensing and processor-controlled operation that allows the device to self-regulate its feeding cycles. This reduces the need for complex manual intervention while maintaining consistent dispensing, effectively managing the complexity-consistency trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If remote control and programming capabilities are added, then adaptability and ease of operation are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeding method versatilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor-based control system serves multiple functions including timing, portion control, remote communication, and various feeding mode management. By consolidating these functions into a single intelligent controller, the system achieves high adaptability without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a remote control unit and processor as an intermediary between the user and the mechanical feeding components. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of programming and remote operations, allowing simple user interaction while maintaining sophisticated control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If conveyor belt with compartments is used, then food portion control is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveportion control accuracyVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The conveyor belt is designed with molded compartments that automatically portion food as it moves along the belt. This segmentation provides precise portion control while using standard molding techniques that keep manufacturing complexity manageable. The compartments are integrated into the belt structure rather than being separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses gravity and controlled mechanical movement to transport food through the compartmentalized conveyor belt without requiring complex pneumatic or hydraulic systems. This approach achieves accurate portioning while maintaining ease of manufacture through simple mechanical design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures consistent and controlled food dispensing, reduces jamming risks, and allows remote programming and monitoring, providing pets with a reliable and customizable feeding solution.

Implementation Method 1

periodically activates a conveyor belt for transporting the dry pet food from the receptacle and into the bowl

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical movement:

Implementation Method 2

The conveyor system includes a drive motor that causes cycling of the conveyor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion:

Implementation Method 3

The food in the container is positioned to gravitationally fall into a receptacle below the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10631520B2Automatic animal feeding system
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 RADIO SYST CORP
  • US10631520B2 patent drawing
  • US10631520B2 patent drawing
  • US10631520B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An animal feeding system is provided. The feeding system includes a container that holds dry pet food, and a receptacle that gravitationally receives the pet food. The system also provides a conveyor system. The conveyor system moves the dry pet food from the receptacle to a feeding bowl. Additionally, the animal feeding system includes a processor. The processor is configured to deliver start and stop signals to a motor in response to signals sent from a user control unit. The animal feeding system additionally comprises the user control unit. The control unit offers a user interface for programming the system according to a desired feeding schedule. A method for feeding an animal using the feeding system is also provided herein.