Conveyor Stuttering for Item Singulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional item transfer systems face issues with clogging and incorrect counting due to the inability to effectively singulate and separate non-oriented items of varying shapes and sizes, leading to reduced efficiency and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a conveyor with a rail and ledge configuration, where items are guided by a rail and those not fitting are recirculated, combined with a conveyor that 'stutters' to separate items, and adjustable rail and detector positioning to accommodate different item sizes and orientations, preventing stacking and ensuring accurate counting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the width between rails is reduced to singulate items, then item singulation is improved, but clogging and jamming occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem singulationVSAvoidsystem clogging
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The conveyor speed is dynamically varied using stutter cycles - alternating between forward motion and pause/reverse - to prevent items from stacking against the rails while maintaining singulation. This dynamic speed adjustment resolves the contradiction by allowing narrow rail spacing without causing clogging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The conveyor operates in periodic stutter cycles with forward movement phases and pause/reverse phases. This periodic action prevents continuous stacking of items against the rails, enabling reliable singulation without clogging even at high throughput rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If conveyor speed is increased to improve productivity, then output is improved, but item separation and counting accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconveyor throughputVSAvoiditem counting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The conveyor uses periodic stutter cycles with alternating high-speed forward motion and pause/reverse phases. During forward motion, items are conveyed at high speed for productivity; during pause/reverse, items are separated and positioned for accurate detection. This periodic variation resolves the contradiction between throughput and counting accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Before items reach the detection zone, the conveyor performs preliminary separation actions during the pause/reverse phase of stutter cycles. This ensures items are properly spaced and positioned before counting, maintaining accuracy even at high overall throughput rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If rails are positioned closer to orient items, then item orientation is improved, but item separation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem orientationVSAvoiditem separation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The conveyor speed dynamically changes during stutter cycles, creating varying forces on items during forward motion and pause/reverse phases. This dynamic speed variation causes items to naturally separate while maintaining orientation, resolving the contradiction between close rail positioning for orientation and sufficient spacing for separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8967366B2System and method for singulating and separating a plurality of non-oriented items
Publication Date: 2015.03.03 BATCHING SYSTEMS INC
  • US8967366B2 patent drawing
  • US8967366B2 patent drawing
  • US8967366B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aspect of the present invention provides a system for transferring a plurality of non-oriented items. The system includes a feeding area, a conveyor and a rail. The feeding area can accept the plurality of non-oriented items. The conveyor has a first end, a second end, a conveyor length disposed between the first end and the second end, a conveyor first side, a conveyor second side, a conveyor width disposed between the conveyor first side and the conveyor second side, and a conveyor ledge along the second side. The rail is disposed above the conveyor and from the conveyor ledge at a distance equal to one of the item height, the item width and the item length. A first portion of the plurality of non-oriented items will convey along the conveyor path. A second portion of the plurality of non-oriented items will fall off the conveyor ledge.