Automated Conveyor Retrieval for Virtual Store Item Interaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional brick-and-mortar stores face inefficiencies in managing inventory and customer interactions, particularly in handling item retrieval and return processes, which can lead to increased operational costs and customer dissatisfaction.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a central computer system, conveyor system, return sensor system, and user interface device that allows customers to request item interaction and returns through a virtual interface, with automated retrieval and inspection processes to manage inventory and customer interactions efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional brick-and-mortar stores place items on sales floors for customer selection, then customers can physically interact with items, but inventory management becomes inefficient and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer item interactionVSAvoidinventory management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts items from the traditional sales floor display and relocates them to automated storage systems. Customers interact with items through automated retrieval mechanisms rather than direct shelf access, separating the customer interaction function from the inventory storage function to improve management efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated retrieval system as an intermediary between customers and inventory storage. This mediator handles item retrieval, presentation, and return processes, eliminating the need for manual inventory management while maintaining customer access to products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If manual item retrieval and return processes are used, then customers receive personalized service, but processing time increases and customer satisfaction decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem retrieval processVSAvoidcustomer waiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service automated system where customers can request items through an interface, and the system automatically retrieves and presents items without requiring staff assistance. The system also automatically processes returns by detecting when items are returned and updating inventory status, significantly reducing customer waiting time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical retrieval processes with an automated mechanical retrieval system. The automated system uses sensors, conveyors, and robotic mechanisms to retrieve and present items, eliminating the time-consuming manual processes while maintaining service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated conveyor systems are implemented, then item retrieval efficiency improves, but system complexity and initial costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem retrieval speedVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the automated retrieval system to perform multiple functions: storing inventory, retrieving items, presenting items to customers, and processing returns. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems for each operation, managing complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates sensor systems that provide feedback on item location, customer requests, and return status. This feedback mechanism enables the automated system to adjust its operations dynamically, optimizing retrieval efficiency while managing system complexity through intelligent control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10600100B2Apparatus and method for providing item interaction with a virtual store
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US10600100B2 patent drawing
  • US10600100B2 patent drawing
  • US10600100B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, and methods are provided herein for store management. A system for store management comprises: a storage system in a backroom area, a conveyor system, a return sensor system, and a control circuit. The control circuit being configured to: receive an interact request from a customer via a user interface device in a showroom area, cause the conveyor system to retrieve one or more items from the storage system and transport the one or more items to the item interaction area based on the interact request, receive a return request, cause the return sensor system to collect data from the at least one item, determine whether to accept the return request based on the data collected by the return sensor system, and cause the conveyor system to retrieve the at least one item from the customer and make the at least one item available for another customer.