Linear Motor Conveyor Zone Control Timing Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional linear motor conveyor systems face challenges with increasing complexity and processing power requirements as they scale up, leading to network bandwidth constraints and discontinuities in control data across zone boundaries, affecting the smooth operation of moving elements at high speeds.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a dual-network architecture with zone controllers and motor gateways to communicate control data in a structured manner, using latching sequences or event-driven methods to synchronize data and avoid timing discontinuities, allowing seamless control across zone boundaries and reducing network burden.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the linear motor system is expanded with more linear motors and more moving elements and faster speeds, then the productivity and speed of the conveyor system is improved, but the complexity of the system and processing power requirements increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconveyor speed and throughputVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple zone controllers, each managing a specific portion of the conveyor. This segmentation allows the system to scale by adding more zone controllers without overwhelming a single controller, thereby maintaining productivity while managing complexity through distributed control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical control dimension with zone controllers managing local areas and a central controller coordinating overall system operation. This multi-dimensional control structure enables the system to handle increased productivity requirements by adding control layers rather than simply increasing the capacity of individual controllers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the linear motor system is expanded with more linear motors and more moving elements and faster speeds, then the productivity and speed of the conveyor system is improved, but the processing power needed to control the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconveyor speed and throughputVSAvoidprocessing power requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

Processing power is distributed across multiple zone controllers instead of being concentrated in a single controller. Each zone controller handles the processing requirements for its local segment, reducing the processing burden on any single device while enabling the system to achieve higher overall productivity through parallel processing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the linear motor system is expanded with more linear motors and more moving elements and faster speeds, then the productivity and speed of the conveyor system is improved, but systems that rely on networks can become constrained for lack of available bandwidth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconveyor speed and throughputVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The network communication is segmented into multiple zone-level networks, each handling data traffic for its local zone. This reduces the bandwidth requirements on any single network segment while enabling high-speed data exchange across the entire system, thus supporting increased productivity without network bandwidth constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If conventional control architecture is used, then the system operates normally, but the processing burden on certain devices increases as the system size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation stabilityVSAvoidprocessing burden on control devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The control architecture is segmented into multiple zone controllers that independently manage their local zones. This distribution of control functions reduces the processing burden on any single device while maintaining system reliability through modular operation, where each zone controller can continue functioning even if others experience issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3148904B1System and method for controlling a moving element in a linear motor conveyor
Publication Date: 2021.05.05 ATS AUTOMATION TOOLING SYSTEMS INC
  • EP3148904B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3148904B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3148904B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A system for controlling moving elements including: a zone controller; a first network and a second network operatively connected to the zone controller; at least one first motor gateway associated with a portion of the conveyor and assigned to the first network; and at least one second motor gateway associated with a different portion of the conveyor and assigned to the second network; wherein the zone controller, the at least one first motor gateway, and the at least one second motor gateway are configured to: communicate data related to control of the moving elements via the first network and the second network in a structured manner to compensate for network or processing timing. A method for controlling moving elements including: communicating data related to control of the moving element conveyor between a zone controller and at least one first motor gateway and at least one second motor gateway, wherein the data is communicated in a structured manner to compensate for network or processing timing.