Cooking Chamber Scheduling for Mixed-Load Energy Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooking methods lack flexibility and automation, leading to inefficiencies in energy consumption, time management, and weight loss optimization during cooking processes, especially when handling multiple products and programs.

Innovation Solution

A method that allows for the selection of starting and ending times, cooking products, and programs based on multiple parameters, optimizing energy consumption, time, and weight loss by indicating when to load and unload products, and enabling interlaced or stacked cooking programs, with automatic plausibility testing and energy-optimized program linkage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If multiple cooking products and programs are handled simultaneously with manual control, then cooking flexibility is maintained, but energy consumption increases and time management becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidcooking process automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The cooking appliance automatically determines optimal cooking parameters, schedules multiple programs, and manages cooking processes without continuous user intervention. The system self-optimizes energy consumption by independently calculating and adjusting cooking parameters based on product characteristics and desired outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts cooking parameters (temperature, time, power levels) based on selected optimization criteria. Users can choose to optimize for energy consumption, time, or weight loss, and the system modifies cooking parameters accordingly to achieve the selected optimization goal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If cooking processes are optimized for energy consumption, then energy efficiency improves, but cooking time may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidcooking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows users to select different optimization criteria (energy consumption, time, or weight loss). When energy optimization is selected, the system adjusts cooking parameters to minimize energy usage while still achieving the desired cooking result, even if this extends the cooking time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The cooking program dynamically adjusts parameters during the cooking process based on the selected optimization criterion. The system can modify temperature profiles, power levels, and timing to balance energy consumption against cooking time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If manual control is used for cooking processes, then operational simplicity is maintained, but cooking reliability and precision decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines optimal cooking parameters, schedules multiple programs, and manages cooking processes without continuous user intervention. The system self-optimizes energy consumption by independently calculating and adjusting cooking parameters based on product characteristics and desired outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors and control mechanisms that monitor cooking progress and adjust parameters in real-time to ensure reliable and precise cooking results. The feedback loop allows the system to maintain high cooking reliability by continuously comparing actual state with target state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If multiple cooking programs are run simultaneously, then productivity increases, but coordination complexity and resource management become problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking productivityVSAvoidprogram coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows users to pre-select and schedule multiple cooking programs in advance. The control unit automatically coordinates the execution of these programs, determining optimal start times, resource allocation, and parameter settings for each program before the cooking processes begin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cooking appliance is designed to handle multiple different cooking programs and product types simultaneously through a universal control system. The system can adapt its control strategies and parameter settings to accommodate various cooking requirements while managing multiple programs concurrently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8455028B2Method for conducting at least one cooking process
Publication Date: 2013.06.04 RATIONAL AG
  • US8455028B2 patent drawing
  • US8455028B2 patent drawing
  • US8455028B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating at least one cooking process in a cooking chamber of a cooking appliance is based on a multiple number of parameters that can be entered through an input device of the cooking appliance. Based on the parameters, at least one cooking product and/or cooking program, at least one starting and/or ending time of the cooking of at least one cooking product and/or for at least one cooking program, and at least one cooking parameter can be selected. An output device indicates when each cooking product is to be loaded into and removed from the cooking chamber in dependence of the starting time and/or ending time, and the selection of a multiple number of cooking products. Additionally, the sequence of cooking of the cooking products can be optimized based on at least one parameter that determines at least one cooking parameter.