Household cooking appliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Household cooking appliances lack the ability to automatically adapt their operating state to a cooking compartment divider, requiring manual adjustments for specific cooking procedures, which can lead to operational errors and limitations in cooking flexibility.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an identifying facility that mechanically or electronically detects the presence and type of cooking compartment divider, allowing the appliance to adapt its operating state and display options accordingly, enabling specific cooking programs and preventing misuse or damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual adaptation of operating state is required when cooking compartment divider is used, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates and operational errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The identifying facility automatically detects the cooking compartment divider's presence and type, and the control facility automatically adapts the operating state without user intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously identifying the divider configuration and selecting appropriate cooking modes, eliminating manual adaptation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The identifying facility provides feedback about the cooking compartment divider's presence and type to the control facility, which then adjusts the operating state accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures the appliance automatically responds to the divider configuration, preventing operational errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If manual adaptation of operating state is required, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to potential operational errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously identifies the cooking compartment divider and adapts the operating state without relying on user knowledge or manual configuration. This self-service capability eliminates human error sources, thereby improving reliability while maintaining relatively simple device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The identifying facility continuously monitors the cooking compartment divider status and provides feedback to the control facility, which automatically adjusts operating parameters. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable operation by preventing incorrect cooking modes from being selected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If identifying facility is added to automatically detect cooking compartment divider, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The identifying facility acts as an intermediary component that detects the cooking compartment divider's presence and type, translating physical configuration into signals that the control facility can process. This intermediary enables automatic adaptation without requiring complex user interfaces or manual input mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical adaptation process is replaced with an automated identifying facility that uses electrical or electronic detection methods. This substitution eliminates the need for manual switches, dials, or complex mechanical interfaces, achieving automation through simpler sensing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If identifying facility and automatic adaptation are implemented, then operational errors are prevented improving reliability, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The identifying facility provides continuous feedback about the cooking compartment divider configuration to the control facility, which automatically adjusts operating parameters. This feedback loop ensures reliable operation by preventing incorrect modes from being activated, while the feedback mechanism itself remains relatively simple in implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The appliance autonomously identifies the cooking compartment divider and adapts its operating state without user intervention. This self-service capability improves reliability by eliminating human error while keeping the system relatively simple through automated sensing and control integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20230408103A1Household cooking appliance
Publication Date: 2023.12.21 BSH HAUSGERATE GMBH
  • US20230408103A1 patent drawing
  • US20230408103A1 patent drawing
  • US20230408103A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A household cooking appliance includes a cooking compartment for receiving food to be cooked, a cooking compartment divider received in the cooking compartment for dividing the cooking compartment into different cooking compartment sections and designed for removal from the cooking compartment, and an identifying facility configured to identify the cooking compartment divider in the cooking compartment and to adapt an operating state of the household cooking appliance to the cooking compartment divider in response to an identification of the cooking compartment divider.