Cooking Appliance Control Using Food Surface Area Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooking appliances lack the ability to optimize cooking based on the intrinsic characteristics of foods, leading to approximate cooking results due to pre-recorded cooking cycles that do not account for specific food properties.

Innovation Solution

A control device for cooking appliances that determines cooking parameters as a function of the specific surface area of food ingredients, using descriptive parameters such as shape, size, and state, to characterize and optimize cooking, with a user interface for selecting recipes and preferences to refine cooking cycles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If pre-recorded cooking cycles are used, then the cooking process is simplified and can be operated easily, but the cooking precision deteriorates because the cycles do not account for specific food characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidcooking precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit pre-calculates and stores optimal cooking cycles for various food types and specific surface areas. Before cooking begins, the user inputs food characteristics and the control unit automatically selects the appropriate pre-calculated cycle, eliminating the need for manual optimization while ensuring precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system divides the cooking chamber into multiple heating zones with independently controllable temperatures. Based on the detected specific surface area of the food, the control unit dynamically adjusts temperature parameters in different zones to optimize heat distribution and cooking precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If cooking parameters are optimized based on specific surface area, then cooking precision is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional measurement and calculation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the existing touchscreen interface and processor of the cooking appliance to perform specific surface area calculations and cycle selections. No separate measurement devices or complex external systems are needed—the appliance serves itself by utilizing its own computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit integrates multiple functions: it detects food characteristics, calculates specific surface area, selects appropriate cooking cycles, and adjusts heating parameters all through a single integrated system. The touchscreen serves both as a display and an input device, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the cooking chamber is divided into multiple heating zones, then cooking adaptability is improved for different food types, but the device complexity increases due to multiple heating components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking adaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooking chamber is divided into multiple heating zones, each with its own heating element and temperature control. This segmentation allows different regions to be optimized for different cooking requirements (e.g., high heat for searing, low heat for gentle cooking), enhancing versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple heating zones are controlled by a single integrated control unit that coordinates temperature and timing across all zones. The control unit merges the operation of multiple heating components into a unified cooking process, managing complexity through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for precise characterization and optimization of cooking, enabling better cooking outcomes for various foods with different parameters, and provides an intuitive user interface for selecting recipes and preferences, ensuring optimized cooking cycles.

Implementation Method 1

a heating component for heating the cooking chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9486099B2Cooking device
Publication Date: 2016.11.08 SEB SA
  • US9486099B2 patent drawing
  • US9486099B2 patent drawing
  • US9486099B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control device for a cooking appliance, the cooking appliance including a cooking chamber designed to receive at least one predetermined food or a plurality of ingredients of a predetermined recipe, a heating component for heating the cooking chamber, the control device including a control unit arranged to determine at least one combination of predetermined cooking parameters as a function at least of the specific surface area of the at least one unitary element of the at least one predetermined food or the at least one ingredient of the plurality of ingredients of the predetermined recipe inserted into the cooking chamber of the cooking appliance, the specific surface area being estimated from descriptive parameters of the at least one unitary element of the predetermined food or the at least one ingredient from among the plurality of ingredients of the predetermined recipe.