Cooking phase identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Consumers face challenges in determining the doneness of food items during cooking due to variations in cooking processes and environments, with existing methods being cumbersome or inaccurate, especially for cooking methods like air frying and water bathing.

Innovation Solution

A cooking method that utilizes image processing to identify the phase of a cooking process by comparing the color of a food item at different times, using a region of interest to derive pixel intensity data and apply functions to determine the phase, which can be implemented by a cooking apparatus with a camera and controller.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If computer vision technology is used for food quality detection in commercial settings, then food quality consistency can be maintained, but the technology cannot be applied during the cooking process itself due to complexity and resource requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking phase identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cooking process into distinct phases (e.g., raw, cooking, cooked, overcooked) and identifies them separately through color analysis. The food item is divided into a region of interest that is monitored specifically, rather than analyzing the entire image, which reduces computational complexity while maintaining identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential feature (color) from the food item images for phase identification, rather than performing comprehensive computer vision analysis. By taking out just the color information from the region of interest and comparing it across time points, the system achieves accurate phase detection with minimal computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive computer vision analysis is performed to identify cooking phase, then accurate phase identification can be achieved, but significant computational resources and cloud-based systems are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking phase identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential feature (color) from the food item images for phase identification, rather than performing comprehensive computer vision analysis. By taking out just the color information from the region of interest and comparing it across time points, the system achieves accurate phase detection with minimal computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses simple, lightweight image processing techniques that can be executed locally on the cooking device rather than relying on expensive cloud-based computer vision systems. The approach uses basic color comparison algorithms that consume minimal energy and can run on embedded processors in consumer appliances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Measurement precision

If weight change detection is used to determine doneness, then cooking phase can be identified for some food types, but the method is incompatible with water bathing and air frying processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoneness detection accuracyVSAvoidcompatibility with different cooking methods
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal color-based detection method that works across multiple cooking methods including air frying, water bathing, and conventional heating. By monitoring color changes in the food item, the system adapts to different cooking processes without requiring method-specific calibration, making the doneness detection versatile and broadly applicable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent directly utilizes color changes in the food item as the primary indicator of cooking phase. Different food types and cooking methods produce characteristic color transformations (e.g., browning, fading, darkening) that can be detected and interpreted to determine doneness, providing a universal approach that works regardless of the specific cooking technique used.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

4Ease of operation

If consumers manually check food by inserting a probe 10 minutes before recipe time, then doneness can be assessed, but the process is cumbersome and may result in undercooking or overcooking by more than 10 minutes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience of doneness checkingVSAvoidtiming accuracy for doneness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous monitoring of the food item throughout the entire cooking process by capturing images at multiple time points and continuously analyzing color changes. This eliminates the need for discrete manual checking at fixed intervals, providing uninterrupted observation that accurately tracks the cooking progression and determines the precise moment when doneness is achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent provides real-time feedback to the consumer about the cooking phase by analyzing color changes and communicating the current state (e.g., raw, cooking, cooked, overcooked). This continuous feedback loop allows consumers to know exactly when to stop cooking without manual probing, improving both convenience and timing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12502028B2Cooking phase identification
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 VERSUNI HLDG BV
  • US12502028B2 patent drawing
  • US12502028B2 patent drawing
  • US12502028B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cooking method includes receiving first image data and second image data corresponding to a view of a food item at a first time and at a second time of a cooking process, respectively. A perimeter of the food item visible in the view encloses a first area of the food item. A region of interest in the view that maps to a second area of the food item is selected, which is less than the first area. A phase of the cooking process is identified based on a comparison of a first color of the food item at the first time with a second color of the food item at the second time. The first and second colors are derived from a part of the first image data and a part of the second image data, respectively, that correspond to the region of interest.