Cooking Appliance Scheduling With Prep and Follow-Up Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooking appliance methods fail to account for preparation and follow-up times, leading to inefficient process planning and capacity utilization in commercial kitchens, particularly during events like buffets or large gatherings.

Innovation Solution

A method that automatically suggests an operating sequence for cooking appliances by displaying work programs on a timeline, including preparation and follow-up times, and determines the maximum capacity of food that can be cooked in a cooking chamber with multiple zones, considering the loading state and type of food, to optimize the cooking process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If only cooking time is displayed in the schedule, then the display is simple, but preparation time and follow-up time are not accounted for, leading to inefficient process planning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess planning efficiencyVSAvoidschedule display complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The schedule display is segmented into three distinct time components: preparation time (before cooking), cooking time (actual cooking process), and follow-up time (after cooking). Each work program is represented by separate visual elements showing these time segments, allowing comprehensive process planning while maintaining clear visual organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The schedule transitions from a one-dimensional time display to a two-dimensional visualization where the vertical axis represents different work programs and the horizontal axis represents time sequences. This dimensional expansion allows simultaneous display of multiple work programs with their respective preparation, cooking, and follow-up times without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the cooking appliance operates without capacity planning, then operations are simple, but kitchen staff deployment and resource utilization are inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekitchen staff deployment efficiencyVSAvoidcapacity planning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback on cooking chamber capacity utilization by monitoring the loading state and calculating maximum food capacity. This feedback mechanism enables dynamic adjustment of work programs and staff deployment based on current appliance utilization, improving productivity without requiring complex manual tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The cooking appliance automatically calculates and displays its own capacity information and work program schedules. The system self-monitors its loading state, determines maximum food capacity, and provides this information to operators, eliminating the need for external tracking systems or complex manual planning processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If preparation and follow-up times are excluded from scheduling, then the schedule is easier to manage, but timely service during events cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice timing reliabilityVSAvoidschedule management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates preparation time (activities before cooking such as ingredient preparation and loading) and follow-up time (activities after cooking such as plating and serving) into the work program schedules. This preliminary and post-processing time inclusion ensures that all necessary activities are accounted for, guaranteeing timely service delivery during events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The schedule integrates multiple time components (preparation, cooking, and follow-up times) into a unified work program representation. By merging these previously separate time elements into a single coordinated schedule, the system ensures reliable service timing while maintaining manageable schedule complexity through integrated visualization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2681490B1Method for operating a cooking appliance and kitchen network
Publication Date: 2016.12.07 RATIONAL AG
  • EP2681490B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2681490B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2681490B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to method for operating at lest one cooking appliance comprising a cooking chamber, an input device, a display and a memory device. According to said method, a plurality of work programs for the cooking appliance can be called up from the memory device, including a time that is characteristic of the execution of every work program. Said time is defined, in addition to the duration of the work program, by a preparation time for preparing the program sequence and/or a follow-up time for following up the execution of the work program. The display device is able to display a representative of every stored work program, the respective associated time being displayed above every representative displayed.