Method for installing a cooking system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooking systems face challenges in achieving precise alignment of heating units during assembly, leading to suboptimal cooking results and energy inefficiencies due to manual alignment methods.

Innovation Solution

A method for assembling a cooking system that utilizes an alignment parameter determination unit to automatically or semi-automatically determine and adjust the position of the heating unit relative to the target installation position, ensuring optimal alignment and energy transfer through electronic and/or electromagnetic means.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual alignment methods are used during assembly, then the assembly process is simple, but the alignment precision is insufficient leading to suboptimal cooking results and energy inefficiencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidassembly system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical alignment methods with an electronic alignment parameter determination unit that automatically detects and determines alignment parameters. This substitution of mechanical/manual systems with electronic/automated systems directly resolves the contradiction by improving alignment precision while managing system complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The alignment parameter determination unit enables the cooking system to automatically determine its own alignment parameters without external intervention. The system self-diagnoses and self-adjusts by detecting coupling parameters between heating units and installation units, eliminating the need for manual alignment tools and procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual alignment is performed by a fitter using markings, then the assembly process is straightforward, but time is lost and alignment accuracy is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly efficiencyVSAvoidalignment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual process of using markings and visual alignment with an electronic detection system that automatically measures alignment parameters. This electronic substitution eliminates the time-consuming manual procedures while improving assembly efficiency through automated parameter determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The alignment parameter determination unit provides real-time feedback on alignment status by detecting coupling parameters. This feedback mechanism allows for immediate adjustment and verification, eliminating the iterative trial-and-error process inherent in manual alignment and significantly reducing alignment time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If heating unit position is not precisely aligned, then assembly is easier, but energy transfer efficiency decreases and power losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower lossVSAvoidalignment determination system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects and determines alignment parameters through its own built-in alignment parameter determination unit, eliminating the need for external alignment tools or complex adjustment mechanisms. This self-service capability reduces energy losses by ensuring optimal alignment without adding significant system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The alignment parameter determination unit continuously monitors coupling parameters and provides feedback on alignment quality. This feedback enables real-time optimization of the heating unit position relative to the installation unit, minimizing power losses and maximizing energy transfer efficiency while keeping the system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3714211B1Method for installing a cooking system
Publication Date: 2022.11.02 BSH HAUSGERATE GMBH
  • EP3714211B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3714211B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3714211B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

In order to provide a method for installing a generic system with improved ease of installation, a method is proposed for installing a cooking system (10a-b) comprising at least one heating unit (12a-b) and at least one cooktop plate (14a-b) which defines at least one desired placement position (16a-b) for at least one placement item (18a-b). In said method, during the orientation of a position of the heating unit (12a-b) relative to the desired placement position (16a- b), at least one orientation parameter is at least semi-automatically determined and is taken into consideration during the orientation of a position of the heating unit (12a-b) relative to the desired placement position (16a- b).