Cooking system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooking systems lack a mechanism to ensure safe operation, particularly for elderly or forgetful users, as they do not prevent unauthorized or unsuitable cookware from being heated, leading to potential accidents.

Innovation Solution

A cooking system with an operator interface and control unit that requires an identification characteristic for each placement unit, allowing the control unit to release or block cooking functions based on the unit's identity, ensuring only authorized and suitable cookware is heated, thereby enhancing safety and ease of operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an identification characteristic input mechanism is added to the cooking system, then safety is improved by preventing unauthorized or unsuitable cookware from being heated, but device complexity increases due to the additional operator interface and control logic required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit receives an identification characteristic from the operator interface, compares it against stored data to determine if the placement unit is authorized and suitable, then provides feedback by either enabling or blocking the cooking function. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures safety while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured decision logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The operator interface acts as an intermediary between the user and the control unit, providing a standardized mechanism for inputting identification characteristics. This intermediary layer simplifies the overall system architecture by consolidating user interaction functions and maintaining clear separation between input, processing, and execution components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system blocks cooking functions for unknown placement units, then safety is improved by preventing potential accidents, but ease of operation deteriorates due to additional input requirements that may burden elderly or forgetful users

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification of the identification characteristic before enabling the cooking function. By checking authorization and suitability in advance, the system prevents unsafe operations without requiring complex user decisions during cooking, thereby maintaining ease of operation while ensuring safety through pre-validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit automatically processes the identification characteristic and determines whether to enable or block the cooking function without requiring manual intervention or complex user judgment. This self-service approach reduces the cognitive and physical burden on users, particularly elderly or forgetful individuals, while maintaining high safety standards through automated verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11828473B2Cooking system
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 BSH HAUSGERATE GMBH
  • US11828473B2 patent drawing
  • US11828473B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cooking system includes an operator interface configured to enable input of an identification characteristic for a placement unit for placement on a cooking surface for purpose of a heating operation, and a control unit configured to release or block a cooking function for the placement unit as a function of the identification characteristic input via the operator interface.