Cooktop appliances and control methods for the same

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cooktop appliances face challenges in achieving precise temperature control due to noise, thermal lag, and limitations in control systems, particularly in radiant cooktops.

Innovation Solution

A cooktop appliance with an electric heating element and a controller that generates a temperature setting, activates the heating element, calculates a projected maximum temperature, and deactivates it when the projected temperature exceeds the setting to maintain precise control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If temperature sensors and feedback control are used to directly measure and adjust cooking temperature, then temperature control precision is improved, but system complexity and control limitations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the temperature sensing function from the control system by removing physical temperature sensors. Instead of using sensors to directly measure cooking surface temperature, the system calculates temperature based on power output data and thermal models, thereby simplifying the control system while maintaining temperature control capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical temperature sensing system with a computational approach. Temperature is determined through mathematical calculations based on electrical power measurements and thermal conduction models, substituting physical sensors with algorithm-based temperature estimation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If continuous monitoring and adjustment based on sensor feedback is implemented, then temperature precision is improved, but control component life is reduced due to increased wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control precisionVSAvoidcontrol component life
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic power delivery to the heating element rather than continuous operation. The controller delivers power in controlled cycles, allowing the heating element and control components to rest between activation periods, thereby extending their operational life while maintaining effective temperature control through the thermal inertia of the cooking surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the thermal mass and inherent thermal properties of the cooking surface and utensils to maintain temperature between power delivery cycles. The cooking surface itself serves as a thermal buffer that continues to provide heat without active control during off-periods, reducing the workload on control components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If predetermined power output levels are used for heating elements, then operation simplicity is maintained, but temperature control precision deteriorates due to thermal lag and hysteresis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidtemperature control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by calculating and compensating for thermal lag effects before they manifest in actual temperature deviations. The controller uses thermal models to predict future temperature based on current power output and historical data, adjusting power delivery in advance to prevent overshooting or undershooting the target temperature

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a computational feedback mechanism that continuously monitors power output and calculates the resulting temperature effects. The system uses this feedback to adjust subsequent power delivery, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains precision without requiring physical temperature sensors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances precision in temperature control by preventing overshooting and extending the life of control components through a simplified power control method.

Implementation Method 1

electric heating elements for heating cooking utensils, such as pots, pans and griddles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10813172B2Cooktop appliances and control methods for the same
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS INC
  • US10813172B2 patent drawing
  • US10813172B2 patent drawing
  • US10813172B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cooktop appliance includes an electric heating element positioned at a cooking surface and a controller operably connected to the electric heating element. The controller is configured to generate a temperature setting. The controller is also configured to activate the electric heating element and calculate a projected maximum temperature. The controller is further configured to deactivate the electric heating element when the projected maximum temperature is greater than the temperature setting.