Cooktop Pan Detection for Multi-Vessel Coverage Case Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooktops with pan detection functions struggle to accurately and automatically determine the coverage situation of cooking vessels on multiple heating elements, leading to inefficient heating operations.

Innovation Solution

A cooktop with a method that uses pan detection sensors to determine the relative coverage of each heating element by a cooking vessel, comparing coverage across adjacent elements to identify specific cases of vessel placement, allowing for automatic or manual adjustment of heating operations to ensure uniform heating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pan detection means is used to detect coverage of each heating element, then the coverage situation can be detected, but the device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control logic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heating elements are designed to serve dual functions: both heating the cookware and detecting the presence and coverage of pans. By making the heating elements themselves detectable by the control unit through their electrical characteristics, the patent eliminates the need for separate detection sensors, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining accurate coverage detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The heating elements perform self-detection of pan coverage by monitoring changes in their own electrical properties when a pan is placed upon them. This self-service approach allows the system to detect coverage situations without external sensors, simplifying the overall device architecture while preserving measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automatic heating operation is implemented based on coverage detection, then heating efficiency improves, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit pre-establishes heating strategies for different coverage scenarios (full coverage, partial coverage, single element coverage) based on the detected pan positions. By preparing these heating patterns in advance and automatically selecting the appropriate pattern based on real-time detection, the system achieves efficient automatic heating without requiring complex real-time decision-making algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the coverage situation through the heating elements and automatically adjusts the heating power distribution accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables efficient automatic heating operation where the control unit responds to detected coverage changes by modifying heating strategies, achieving high productivity with relatively simple control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If heating elements are arranged adjacently along a straight line, then the cooktop structure is simplified, but the ability to accommodate different cookware sizes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidcookware accommodation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit dynamically adjusts the heating power distribution across the adjacently arranged heating elements based on the detected pan coverage pattern. By enabling independent or grouped operation of individual elements and dynamically modifying power levels, the system compensates for the fixed linear arrangement, maintaining structural simplicity while achieving high adaptability to various cookware sizes and shapes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and automatic heating of cooking vessels by accurately determining the number and placement of vessels, optimizing power distribution across heating elements for uniform temperature and reduced energy consumption.

Implementation Method 1

A plurality of heating means in the form of induction heating coils

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

A pan detection means is in each case provided, in particular formed by the induction heating coils themselves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20230199920A1Method for operating a cooktop and cooktop
Publication Date: 2023.06.22 E G O ELEKTRO GERAETEBAU GMBH
  • US20230199920A1 patent drawing
  • US20230199920A1 patent drawing
  • US20230199920A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method for operating a cooktop having a cooktop plate and adjacent heating means arranged thereunder along a straight line, and a pan detection means for detecting a relative coverage of each heating means by cooking vessels placed thereover, it is detected in a preceding step over which of the heating means a cooking vessel has been placed and thus that a relative coverage is present. In a subsequent step, the pan detection means is used to detect how great is the relative coverage of each covered heating means, and from this result and a comparison of these results for each heating means a case analysis is performed into one of several cases. For a 1st case, in which it is detected for the three heating means arranged along the straight line, that the relative coverage of the middle heating means is less than the relative coverage of the other two adjacent heating means, it is determined that no cooking vessel has been placed over the three heating means which contiguously covers all three heating means, but rather that at least two cooking vessels have been placed over the three heating means.