Cookware Handle Attachment with Thin-End Stud and Positioning Base

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing handle attachment devices for cooking utensils are not durable, require excessive material, and incur additional costs due to complex constructions and multiple parts, leading to issues with material degradation and stress during use.

Innovation Solution

A handle attachment device with a pin and base system that minimizes material usage and parts, featuring protrusions on the handle for precise positioning and a screw passage, allowing for secure and direct attachment without rotation, and incorporating a rib for positioning and a return of material for easy cleaning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a massive construction of the handle end is used, then sufficient mechanical characteristics and stress resistance are obtained, but the device complexity and material quantity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical characteristicsVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The handle end is segmented into a modular assembly comprising a base, positioning elements (protrusions), and a retaining element. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function with optimized material usage, avoiding the need for a monolithic massive construction while maintaining sufficient mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces a third dimension by adding a base that extends perpendicular to the handle axis. This base provides additional structural support and stress distribution in a direction orthogonal to the handle, enabling reduced material usage along the handle axis while maintaining overall structural integrity through multi-directional load path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If additional parts are added to improve fixing, then secure attachment is achieved, but manufacturing cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixing securityVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base integrates multiple functions into a single component: it provides structural support, houses the positioning protrusions, and incorporates the retaining element. This merging of functions reduces the total number of parts while maintaining secure attachment, as the base acts as both a mounting structure and a positioning mechanism simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The base is designed as a multi-functional element that performs structural support, positioning, and retention functions. This universality allows a single component to replace what would traditionally require multiple separate parts, reducing manufacturing complexity and assembly steps while ensuring reliable fixation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Strength

If thermosetting plastic with significant wall thickness is used, then sufficient mechanical characteristics are obtained, but material quantity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical characteristicsVSAvoidmaterial quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs a composite structure combining the handle (thermosetting plastic) with a metal base and retaining element. This composite approach allows the plastic to be used only where necessary for its specific functions, while the metal components provide additional structural strength, enabling reduced plastic wall thickness without compromising overall mechanical characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

By extending the structural support into a third dimension through the metal base, the invention reduces the required wall thickness of the plastic handle end. The base provides additional structural rigidity and stress distribution in a direction perpendicular to the handle axis, allowing the plastic to be thinner while maintaining sufficient mechanical strength through the combined composite structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Device complexity

If the handle material is in direct contact with the cap, then simple attachment is achieved, but material degradation occurs due to heating and cooling cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment simplicityVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The metal base acts as an intermediary element between the handle material and the cap. This intermediary layer thermally isolates the handle material from direct contact with the cap, reducing the impact of heating and cooling cycles on the plastic. The base absorbs and dissipates thermal stresses, protecting the handle material from degradation while maintaining the simplicity of the attachment mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP1972243B1Device for attaching a handle with minimum thickness to a culinary item
Publication Date: 2018.05.16 SEB SA
  • EP1972243B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1972243B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The device has a stud (5) comprising a front end (14) fixed to a cap (6) of a culinary article (2), and a rear end (15) provided with an opening. A handle (3) has an end (30) with protrusions (31, 32) forming a housing (33) that receives the stud. A base (8) surrounds the stud and the protrusions, and longitudinally connects the handle with the cap. The protrusions are in contact with two sides of the stud in a transversal lateral axis (42). The base includes a positioning unit for positioning the base against the stud and the handle in a transversal vertical axis (41).