Cool roof systems and methods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional roofing systems face degradation due to ultraviolet light exposure, leading to brittleness and increased energy consumption as polymer chains in waterproof layers break, and existing solutions like granules absorb energy, increasing cooling costs.

Innovation Solution

A membrane roofing system with granules coated in a cationic fluorinated (meth)acrylic copolymer, providing 65% or greater reflectivity to block UV light and resist asphaltic chemical absorption, maintaining reflectivity and reducing energy absorption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If granules are placed on top of waterproof layers to protect from ultraviolet light, then the waterproof layer is protected from UV degradation, but the granules absorb significant amounts of energy which increases cooling costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of waterproof layerVSAvoidenergy absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The granules are colored with light-colored pigments having a solar reflectance of at least 0.65, transforming their optical properties from dark/absorptive to light/reflective. This color change enables the granules to reflect solar radiation while maintaining their UV protective function, thereby resolving the contradiction between protection and energy absorption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The solar reflectance parameter of the granule coating is changed to be at least 0.65, and the coating is formulated with specific polymer content (at least 5% by weight). These parameter changes transform the granules from high-absorption to high-reflection materials while maintaining durability and UV protection capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If granules are used to protect waterproof layers, then ultraviolet light transmission is reduced, but the granules may absorb asphaltic chemicals from the waterproof layer which can degrade the coating

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUV protectionVSAvoidcoating stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

A polymer coating acts as an intermediary layer between the granule substrate and the asphaltic waterproof layer. This intermediate coating prevents direct contact and chemical absorption between the granules and asphaltic chemicals, while still allowing the granules to perform their UV protection function. The polymer coating stabilizes the system by blocking harmful chemical interactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional granules are used for protection, then waterproof layers are shielded from UV light, but the granules lack resistance to asphaltic chemical absorption

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUV light blockingVSAvoidchemical resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The granules are created as composite materials with a substrate (such as glass, ceramic, or metal) coated with a polymer material containing at least 5% by weight polymer. This composite structure combines the UV-blocking properties of the substrate with the chemical resistance and adhesion properties of the polymer coating, achieving both UV protection and chemical stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively protects waterproof layers from UV degradation, maintains high reflectivity, and reduces energy consumption by minimizing energy absorption, thereby lowering cooling costs and enhancing climate control efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The granule has a solar reflectance of at least 0.65, indicating its ability to reflect a significant portion of incident solar radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

The granule is coated in a cationic fluorinated (meth)acrylic copolymer that resists adsorption and absorption of asphaltic chemicals by the granule from the waterproof layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 3

The granule is coated in a cationic fluorinated (meth)acrylic copolymer that resists adsorption and absorption of asphaltic chemicals by the granule from the waterproof layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 4

The granule protects the waterproof layer by reducing transmission of ultraviolet light to the waterproof layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUV light blocking: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentEP3258030B1Cool roof systems and methods
Publication Date: 2020.09.02 JOHNS MANVILLE CORP
  • EP3258030B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3258030B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3258030B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A membrane roofing system that includes a waterproof layer that protects an insulation layer and a granule coupled to the waterproof layer. The granule has a 65% or greater reflectivity that reduces transmission of ultraviolet light to the waterproof layer. The granule is coated in a fluorinated acrylic copolymer that resists adsorption and absorption of asphaltic chemicals by the granule from the waterproof layer.