Electronic Component Cooling Flow Control to Prevent Coolant Dry-Out

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic component cooling devices face challenges in efficiently cooling components without risking dry-out, particularly in systems without a traditional refrigeration cycle, as they often rely on controlling coolant flow based on dryness, limiting their applicability and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

An electronic component cooling device that includes a cooler, coolant temperature and flow rate acquisition units, a heat loss estimation unit, and a flow rate control unit, which adjusts coolant flow rates based on estimated heat loss and internal pressure amplitudes to prevent dry-out and optimize cooling performance, allowing for efficient cooling without excessive coolant supply.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If coolant flow rate is increased to prevent dry-out, then cooling reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The coolant flow rate is dynamically adjusted based on real-time monitoring of internal pressure amplitude and heat loss estimates. The system transitions from static flow rate control to dynamic control, modifying the coolant flow rate according to actual cooling conditions to prevent dry-out while minimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the coolant flow rate parameter based on detected internal pressure amplitude and estimated heat loss. By adjusting this key parameter in response to changing conditions, the system maintains reliable cooling while avoiding excessive energy consumption associated with continuously high flow rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional refrigeration cycle is used to control coolant flow based on dryness, then cooling performance is maintained, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling performanceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the complex refrigeration cycle components (compressor, condenser, expansion valve) from the cooling system. Instead, it uses a simplified approach with a pump, cooler, and control unit that monitors internal pressure amplitude and estimates heat loss to adjust coolant flow rate, achieving reliable cooling without the complexity of traditional refrigeration cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The complex mechanical refrigeration cycle is replaced with a simplified control system that uses sensors to detect internal pressure amplitude and a control unit to estimate heat loss and adjust pump operation. This substitution reduces mechanical complexity while maintaining cooling performance through intelligent control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If excessive coolant is supplied to ensure cooling, then cooling ability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling abilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the internal pressure amplitude of the coolant and using this information to estimate heat loss from the electronic component. The control unit adjusts the coolant flow rate based on this feedback, ensuring adequate cooling ability while avoiding excessive energy consumption from unnecessarily high flow rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively prevents dry-out and enhances cooling efficiency by dynamically adjusting coolant flow rates, ensuring reliable cooling performance while minimizing energy consumption and maintaining optimal cooling ability.

Implementation Method 1

a cooler 2 that cools the electronic component E by circulating a coolant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

the coolant may boil as a result of an increase in the temperature of the coolant that has received heat from the electronic component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

the coolant may boil as a result of an increase in the temperature of the coolant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoiling: Boiling

Data Source

PatentUS11778779B2Electronic component cooling device
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 DENSO CORP
  • US11778779B2 patent drawing
  • US11778779B2 patent drawing
  • US11778779B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an electronic component cooling device, a cooler cools an electronic component, a coolant temperature acquisition unit acquires a temperature of a coolant, a coolant flow rate acquisition unit acquires the flow rate of the coolant, a heat loss estimation unit estimates a heat loss from the electronic component, and a loss threshold calculation unit calculates an upper limit threshold of the heat loss from the electronic component based on the coolant temperature and the coolant flow rate. A coolant flow rate control unit controls the flow rate of the coolant and is configured to, in response to an estimated heat loss which is the heat loss from the electronic component that has been estimated by the heat loss estimation unit exceeding the upper limit threshold, increase the flow rate of the coolant circulating through the cooler.